HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Methodologies

HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Methodologies

HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Methodologies Essay Assignment

HQS-620: Project Management in Health Care Grand Canyon University

Course Description

This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.

Order a Custom Nursing Paper

Assessment Description

The goal of this assignment is to compare and contrast different project management methodologies that can be used in health care project management. Conduct your own research to compare and contrast the methodologies of Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile. Choose another project management methodology of your choice.

To finish the assignment, use the HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies template.

This assignment necessitates the use of two to three scholarly resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and source documentation should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the Student Success Center’s APA Style Guide.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

Resources

Collapse All

9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple

Read “9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple,” by Aston, located on the Digital Project Manager website

Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today

Read “Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today,” by Hakim, from Physician Leadership Journal (2019).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.579714743&site=eds-live&scope=site

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies: Case Studies

Read “Project Management Methodologies” in Project Management: Case Studies.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site

How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project

Read “How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project,” by Silver et al., from American Society of Nephrology (2016).

https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/clinjasn/11/5/893.full.pdf

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement

Read “A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement,” by Tremblay Aubry, R

… Read More

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies

Help with my nursing project

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00126450-201801000-00002&D=ovft&PDF=y

Top Project Management Methodologies 2019

View “Top Project Management Methodologies 2019,” from KnowledgeHut, located on YouTube.

Project Management for Healthcare

Read the “Safety” and “Regulatory” sections of Chapter 2 in “Project Management for Healthcare,” by Shirley (2011

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.or

HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Template

Directions: Research information about the project management methodologies listed below to complete the table. In addition, conduct your own research on other project management methodologies and include this in the table below. The assignment requires a minimum of two or three scholarly resources. A resource may be used more than once in the last column of the template.

Project Management Methodology Description Pros Cons Example of when this methodology would be appropriate Scholarly Resource
Lean/Six Sigma
Waterfall
PDSA
Agile
Choose an additional project management methodology here

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies Rubric

Collapse All

Lean/Six Sigma

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Lean/Six Sigma

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present but lack details or are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are not present.

Waterfall

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Waterfall

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present but lack details or are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Waterfall are not present.

PDSA

14.4 points

Criteria Description

PDSA

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for PDSA are present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for PDSA are present but lack details or are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for PDSA are not present.

Agile

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Agile

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Agile are present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Agile are present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Agile are present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Agile are present but lack details or are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Agile are not present.

Additional Project Management Methodology

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Additional Project Management Methodology

  1. 5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present but lack details or are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

4 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

4 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

3.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

4 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. 5: Excellent

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

 

Also read: