Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Assignment

Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Assignment

Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Assignment

HQS-620: Project Management in Health Care Grand Canyon University

Course Description

This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule assignment is to create a Gantt chart to outline the tasks and schedule for the case study you selected in the Class Resources. Recall that you created a project charter as the Topic 3 assignment. Review the feedback you received from your instructor for that assignment.

Part 1: Use the feedback from the Topic 3 assignment to create a HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt chart showing the tasks and the time in which tasks should be completed for the project.To complete this assignment, access the Simple Gantt Chart located on the Microsoft Office website at: https://templates.office.com/en-us/simple-gantt-chart-tm16400962

Part 2: Create a 250-500-word HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule summary addressing the following:

  1. What is the value of a work breakdown structure?
  2. What is the importance of monitoring critical success factors?

Submit both the HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt chart and the summary to the dropbox.

Prepare the Part 2 summary according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Get assistance with your nursing paper

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Resources

Collapse All

A Visual Management Tool for Program Planning, Project Management and Evaluation in Paediatric Health Care

Read “A Visual Management Tool for Program Planning, Project Management and Evaluation in Paediatric Health Care,” by Glegg, Ryce

… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0149718918300120

Project Management: Case Studies

Read “Project Planning” in Project Management: Case Studies.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapter 4 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

The Art of Project Planning

Read “The Art of Project Planning,” by Stolovitsky, from Genius Inside (2014).

https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/art-of-project-planning.pdf

What Is a Gantt Chart?

Read “What Is a Gantt Chart” located on the Association for Project Management website (2019).

https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/gantt-chart/

Step by Step Guide to Implement Quality Improvement

Read “Step by Step Guide to Implement Quality Improvement,” from the Center for Public Health Quality (CPHQ), located on the Asso

… Read More

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Assignment

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Rubric

Collapse All

Gantt Chart Alignment of Tasks

25 points

Criteria Description

Gantt Chart Alignment of Tasks

  1. 5: Excellent

25 points

A Gantt Chart is present and thoroughly aligns with the tasks on the Project Charter.

  1. 4: Good

23 points

A Gantt Chart is present and somewhat aligns with the tasks on the Project Charter.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

22 points

A Gantt Chart is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

20 points

A Gantt Chart is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A Gantt Chart is not present.

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt Chart Alignment of Deadlines

25 points

Criteria Description

Gantt Chart Alignment of Deadlines

  1. 5: Excellent

25 points

Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present and thoroughly align to the deadlines on the Project Charter.

  1. 4: Good

23 points

Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present and somewhat align to the deadlines on the Project Charter.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

22 points

Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

20 points

Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present, but lack details or are incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are not present.

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Presentation

11 points

Criteria Description

Presentation

  1. 5: Excellent

11 points

The submission is presented effectively and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

  1. 4: Good

10.12 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

9.68 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

8.8 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

Synthesis

12 points

Criteria Description

Synthesis

  1. 5: Excellent

12 points

Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.

  1. 4: Good

11.04 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Value of a Work Breakdown Structure

11 points

Criteria Description

Value of a Work Breakdown Structure

  1. 5: Excellent

11 points

An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

10.12 points

An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

9.68 points

An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

8.8 points

An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is not present.

Critical Success Factors

11 points

Criteria Description

Critical Success Factors

  1. 5: Excellent

11 points

An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

10.12 points

An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

9.68 points

An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

8.8 points

An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is not present.

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Also read: