HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Implementation Checklist

HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Implementation Checklist

HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment

HQS-620: Project Management in Health Care Grand Canyon University

Course Description

This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment is to outline an implementation strategy for the goals in the previous phases of project management for the case study you selected in the Class Resources.

Use the “Implementation Checklist Template” located in the topic Resources folder to complete this assignment.

Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Project Management Implementation Checklistt Template

Part 1: An implementation checklist can keep a project on track by outlining specific activities, which stakeholder is responsible, and by planning a due date. Fill in the Project Management Implementation Checklist below for the case study.

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment

Step Activity Stakeholder Responsibility Due Date

Get assistance with your nursing paper

Part 2: In 250-500 words, address the following:

  1. Explain the importance of an implementation checklist.
  1. Explain the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management.

Project Management Implementation Checklist – Rubric

Collapse All

Implementation Checklist Template

30 points

Criteria Description

Implementation Checklist Template

  1. 5: Excellent

30 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.

  1. 4: Good

27.6 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present and includes relevant details.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

26.4 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

24 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Implementation Checklist Template is not present.

Importance of Project Management Implementation Checklist Checklist

20 points

Criteria Description

Importance of Implementation Checklist

  1. 5: Excellent

20 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

18.4 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

17.6 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is not present.

Addressing Change Management

20 points

Criteria Description

Addressing Change Management

  1. 5: Excellent

20 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

18.4 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

17.6 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is not present.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

  1. 5: Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

  1. 4: Good

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

  1. 5: Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

  1. 4: Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Help with my nursing project paper

Project Management Implementation Checklist Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Resources

Collapse All

Implementation Checklist Template

Utilize the “Implementation Checklist Template” to complete the topic assignment.

HQS-620-RS-ImplementationChecklist.docx

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Review Chapter 4 and Read Chapter 5 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital

Read “Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital,” by Moradi, Jafari, Maleki, Na

Also read: