Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment

Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment

Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment

HQS-620: Project Management in Health Care Grand Canyon University

Course Description

This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment is to use a Fishbone Diagram to complete a root cause analysis. Identify a problem in your practice environment and utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to work through the problem to the root cause. Refer to “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located in the topic Resources to complete this assignment.

While APA style is not required for Part 1, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Get help with nursing assignment

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Resources

Collapse All

Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone

Read “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located on the Vanguard s website (2018) for successful completion of the assignment/

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapter 6 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template

Utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to complete the topic assignment.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment – Rubric

Collapse All

Fishbone Diagram

40 points

Criteria Description

Fishbone Diagram

  1. 5: Excellent

40 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes substantial relevant details.

  1. 4: Good

36.8 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes relevant details.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

35.2 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

32 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram Assignment is not complete or is incorrect.

Progress Tracking in Project Management

15 points

Criteria Description

Progress Tracking in Project Management

  1. 5: Excellent

15 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and thorough.

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment

  1. 4: Good

13.8 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

13.2 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is not present.

Implementing Project Adjustments

15 points

Criteria Description

Implementing Project Adjustments

  1. 5: Excellent

15 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and thorough.

  1. 4: Good

13.8 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and detailed.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

13.2 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is not present.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

  1. 5: Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

  1. 4: Good

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

  1. 5: Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

  1. 4: Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Order A Custom Nursing Paper

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Also read: