Vision & Non-Visual Senses & Applying Hypothesis Testing
Vision & Non-Visual Senses & Applying Hypothesis Testing
Vision & Non-Visual Senses & Applying Hypothesis Testing
(Part 1) Vision:::
Vision & Non-Visual Senses & Applying Hypothesis Testing
https://topnursingpapers.com/vision-non-visual-senses-applying-hypothesis-testing/
Locate and read a recent full-text article from the Capella Library about a one aspect of vision (for example, color vision or depth perception). Describe the aspect, the optical and brain structures that acquire and recognize it, and the impact of damage to these structures.
Vision & Non-Visual Senses & Applying Hypothesis Testing (Part 2) Non-Visual Senses:::
Locate and read a recent full-text article from the Capella Library about one of the non-visual senses and a related phenomenon (for example, the cutaneous senses and pain, or the vestibular system and motion sickness). Describe the phenomenon, the related sensory and brain structures, and how damage to one or more of these structures can impact the sensation or perception of this phenomenon.
Your nursing paper is in safe hands. Trust the experts for the best nursing papers.
- Count on the best nursing essay papers writing service online. Order custom papers; No plagiarism. Your success, our success.
(Part 3) Applying Hypothesis Testing:::
For this discussion, answer the following questions:
What is a null hypothesis?
What is an alternative hypothesis?
Articulate a null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis for a research study that pertains to your area of specialization.(My area of specialization is Sport Psychology)
What conclusions can be drawn from this study with a “statistically significant” result?
Vision & Non-Visual Senses & Applying Hypothesis Testing
(Readings For Parts 1 & 2)
Complete the following:
In your Physiology of Behavior text, read:
Chapter 6, “Vision,” pages 164–206.
Chapter 7, “Audition, the Body Senses, and the Chemical Sense,” pages 207–254.
Read Brain Facts: A Primer on the Brain and Nervous System, pages 12–17.
Name: Discussion Rubric
| Excellent 90–100 |
Good 80–89 |
Fair 70–79 |
Poor 0–69 |
|||
| Main Posting: Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
||
| Main Posting: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Posts main Discussion by due date. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
||
| First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: Discussion Rubric
24/7 Nursing Homework Help
Stuck on a nursing assignment question? From easy essays to complicated dissertations, our accredited writers can answer all questions!
