Research Critiques And PICOT Statement Final Draft Essay
Research Critiques And PICOT Statement Final Draft Essay
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the Topic 1, 2, and 3 assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Statement
Revise the PICOT statement you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment.
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of the study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT statement.
Refer to “Research Critique Guidelines.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
Discuss the link between the PICOT statement, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Rubric Criteria
|
Criterion |
1. 1: Unsatisfactory |
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory |
3. 3: Satisfactory |
4. 4: Good |
5. 5: Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
9.75 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
10.79 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
12.22 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
13 points All format elements are correct. |
|
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change |
0 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included. |
19.5 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect. |
21.58 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details. |
24.44 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details. |
26 points The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details. |
|
Method of Studies Method of Studies |
0 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete. |
9.75 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. |
10.79 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. |
12.22 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. |
13 points Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. |
|
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points Sources are not documented. |
9.75 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
10.79 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
12.22 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
13 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
Conclusion Conclusion |
0 points Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings. |
9.75 points Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. |
10.79 points Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice. |
12.22 points Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. |
13 points Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice. |
|
Results of Studies Results of Studies |
0 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. |
9.75 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. |
10.79 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. |
12.22 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. |
13 points Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. |
|
Evidence of Revision Evidence of Revision |
0 points Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. |
19.5 points Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. |
21.58 points Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. |
24.44 points Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. |
26 points Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. |
|
Background of Studies Background of Studies |
0 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. |
9.75 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. |
10.79 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. |
12.22 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. |
13 points Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. |
|
Ethical Considerations Ethical Considerations |
0 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete. |
9.75 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. |
10.79 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. |
12.22 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. |
13 points Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. |
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
19.5 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. |
21.58 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
24.44 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
26 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
19.5 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
21.58 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
24.44 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
26 points Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship |
0 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included. |
19.5 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect. |
21.58 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. |
24.44 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation. |
26 points Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation. |
|
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose |
0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
19.5 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
21.58 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
24.44 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
26 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question |
0 points A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included. |
9.75 points PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources. |
10.79 points PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources. |
12.22 points PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources. |
13 points PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources. |