Research Critiques And PICOT Statement Final Draft Essay

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

9.75 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

10.79 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

12.22 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

13 points

All format elements are correct.

0 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.

19.5 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.

21.58 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.

24.44 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.

26 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.

0 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.

9.75 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

9.75 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

10.79 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

12.22 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

13 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

0 points

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

9.75 points

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

10.79 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

12.22 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

13 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

0 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.

9.75 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

0 points

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

19.5 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

21.58 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

24.44 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

26 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

0 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.

9.75 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

0 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

9.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

19.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

21.58 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

24.44 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

26 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

19.5 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

21.58 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

24.44 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

26 points

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

0 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.

19.5 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.

21.58 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.

24.44 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.

26 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

19.5 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

21.58 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

24.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

26 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

0 points

A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.

9.75 points

PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.

10.79 points

PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.

12.22 points

PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.

13 points

PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.