HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Implementation Checklist
HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Implementation Checklist
HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment
HQS-620: Project Management in Health Care Grand Canyon University
Course Description
This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.
Assessment Description
The purpose of this HQS 620 Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment is to outline an implementation strategy for the goals in the previous phases of project management for the case study you selected in the Class Resources.
Use the “Implementation Checklist Template” located in the topic Resources folder to complete this assignment.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Project Management Implementation Checklistt Template
Part 1: An implementation checklist can keep a project on track by outlining specific activities, which stakeholder is responsible, and by planning a due date. Fill in the Project Management Implementation Checklist below for the case study.
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment
| Step | Activity | Stakeholder Responsibility | Due Date |
Get assistance with your nursing paper
Part 2: In 250-500 words, address the following:
- Explain the importance of an implementation checklist.
- Explain the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management.
Project Management Implementation Checklist – Rubric
Collapse All
Implementation Checklist Template
30 points
Criteria Description
Implementation Checklist Template
- 5: Excellent
30 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.
- 4: Good
27.6 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present and includes relevant details.
- 3: Satisfactory
26.4 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
24 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Implementation Checklist Template is not present.
Importance of Project Management Implementation Checklist Checklist
20 points
Criteria Description
Importance of Implementation Checklist
- 5: Excellent
20 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
18.4 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is not present.
Addressing Change Management
20 points
Criteria Description
Addressing Change Management
- 5: Excellent
20 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
18.4 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is not present.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- 5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- 4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- 3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- 5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- 4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Help with my nursing project paper
Project Management Implementation Checklist Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Resources
Collapse All
Implementation Checklist Template
Utilize the “Implementation Checklist Template” to complete the topic assignment.
HQS-620-RS-ImplementationChecklist.docx
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Review Chapter 4 and Read Chapter 5 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital
Read “Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital,” by Moradi, Jafari, Maleki, Na
24/7 Nursing Homework Help
Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!
