Discussion: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
Discussion: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
Discussion: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
Use the “Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.
GET PAPER HELP. PLACE AN ORDER FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER Discussion: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer
Question Description
What are three differences (3 for each area by comparing them (1 a, b, c; 2 a, b, c; 3 a, b, c)** between the Motor, sensory, and Associated Areas in the brain. Identify two of such areas, and explain their functions (the area) in that region of the brain, and where exactly (the area) is it located in that region of the brain? Section 12.2 Cortex
**(1 a-motor, b-sensory, c-associated; 2 a-motor, b-sensory, c-associated; 3 a-motor, b-sensory, c-associated).
(B).Explain the different “Errors in Refraction” (Sec 15.5), and describe the major structures in the inner ear, their structure, and function (what do they do & how) of the various parts?
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-514 NUR-514-O502 Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer 120.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Criteria 100.0%
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present. A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to education is present. A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present. A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present. A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present. A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present. A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance 10.0% A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present. A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty 5.0% A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present. A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Visual Appeal 5.0% There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident. Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited. Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout. Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.
Presentation 5.0% The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.