Walden University NURS 6003 Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
Walden University NURS 6003 Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Assignment
Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics – Walden
Nurse-scholars also have a significant responsibility to their community. Their work must be academically and professionally sound. Their efforts are intended to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and, ultimately, aid in patient care. Work that lacks integrity is prone to deterioration or worse.
Fortunately, there are strategies and tools available to help ensure academic and professional integrity. This Assignment requires you to think about these tools and how you might use them in your own work.
In this Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Assignment, you will add to the original document you started in the previous assignment to continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan.
To Get Ready:
Consider the Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics presented in the Module Resources to support academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.
Consider the relationship between academic and professional integrity.
The Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Project:
Section 1 of Part 2: Writing Sample: The Relationship Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you started in Module 1.
- Explanation of the connection between academic integrity and writing
- An explanation for the connection between professional practices and scholarly ethics
- Cite at least two resources that support your claims, using proper APA formatting.
- To improve the product, use Grammarly and SafeAssign.
- Describe how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing help to maintain academic integrity.
Get help with nursing assignment
Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Work Integrity
Expand on your ideas from Section 1 by identifying and describing strategies you plan to use to maintain the integrity and ethics of your:
Academic work as an MSN student and professional work as a nurse throughout your career Include a summary of the resources and approaches you intend to use as a student and professional.
Note: Include your work for this Assignment in the original document you started in the Module 1 Assignment, which was created using the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
By Week 3’s 7th day
Part 2 Sections 1 and 2 must be submitted.
Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Information on Submission and Grading
Do the following to submit your completed Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Assignment for review and grading:
Please save your Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Assignment Assignment with the name “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the extension.
To review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment, click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric.
Select the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for this area’s grading criteria.
Then, in the Attach File section, click the Browse My Computer button. Open the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial. (extension)”.
If appropriate: Click the checkbox next to I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database in the Plagiarism Tools section.
To finish your Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Paper submission, click the Submit button.
Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Criteria for Evaluation
To access your rubric, go to:
Rubric for Week 3 Assignments
Examine the Authenticity of Your Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Assignment Draft
To ensure the authenticity of your Assignment draft:
Submit a draft of your Week 3 Assignment and review the originality report.
Submit your assignment by the 7th day of Week 3.
Looking for writing help with your Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Paper? Ask the experts. Get nursing paper help
Name: NURS_6003_Module02_Week03 Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics Assignment Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity
Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began, write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following: · Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing. · Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. · Cite at least 2 resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting. · Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product. · Explain how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. |
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response accurately cites at least two resources that fully support the arguments explained. The response clearly and accurately describes in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. |
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response partially describes the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response partially describes the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response partially cites at least two resources that partially support the arguments explained. The response partially describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including some evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. |
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response vaguely describes the relationship between academic integrity and writing. The response vaguely describesthe relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics. The response vaguely or inaccurately cites at least two resources that vaguely support the arguments explained. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including vague evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response describing the relationship between academic integrity and writing is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response describing the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response inaccurately cites at least two resources that inaccurately support the arguments explained, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including no evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided. |
| Part 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Expand on your thoughts from Part 1 by: · Identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional. |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes in detail resources and approaches to use as a student and professional. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
The response partially identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. The response partially reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
The response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse. The response inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse, or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional, or is missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|