SOCW 6311 Wk 11 Discussion 1 Peer Responses

SOCW 6311 Wk 11 Discussion 1 Peer Responses essay assignment

SOCW 6311 Wk 11 Discussion 1 Peer Responses essay assignment

Respond to at least two colleagues’ by doing the following:

Respond to at least two colleagues by offering critiques of their analyses. Identify strengths in their analyses and strategies for presenting evaluation results to others.

Identify ways your colleagues might improve their presentations.

Identify potential needs or questions of the audience that they may not have considered.

Provide an additional strategy for overcoming the obstacles or challenges in communicating the content of the evaluation reports.

Get solution to your nursing paper : SOCW 6311 Wk 11 Discussion 1 Peer Responses

Name first and references after every person

Instructor wants lay out like this:

Respond to at least two colleagues ( 2 peers posts are provided) by doing all of the following:

Identify strengths of your colleagues’ analyses and areas in which the analyses could be improved.

Your response

Address his or her evaluation of the efficacy and applicability of the evidence-based practice,

Your response

[Evaluate] his or her identification of factors that could support or hinder the implementation of the evidence-based practice,

Your response

And [evaluate] his or her solution for mitigating those factors.

Your response

Offer additional insight to your colleagues by either identifying additional factors that may support or limit implementation of the evidence-based practice or an alternative solution for mitigating one of the limitations that your colleagues identified.

Your response

References

Your response

Peer 1: McKenna Bull 

RE: Katie Otte Initial Post-Discussion 1 – Week 11

Top of Form

Identify strengths in their analyses and strategies for presenting evaluation results to others.

You provided an insightful analysis of this particular process evaluation, and it seems that you were able to design a comprehensive presentation guideline. I agree with your tactic to break the presentation up into categories, and the categories you have selected seem to address the major components of the program, the evaluation itself, and the findings of said evaluation. You also provided a great analysis and summary of the PATHS program. The purpose of the program is clear, and the overarching purpose of the evaluation was made clear in your synopsis as well.

Identify ways your colleagues might improve their presentations.

You addressed outcome measures very well, however, there may have been some lacking information in regards to overall evaluation methods as a whole. Addressing factors such as who was collecting the data, how they were trained, how their training or standing could limit potential bias, and similar information. This may be an important piece of information that could help to provide audience members with a better understanding of the evaluation processes as a whole.

Identify potential needs or questions of the audience that they may not have considered.

As mentioned by Law and Shek (2011), this program was designed and facilitated in Hong Kong, China. As such, the program takes on a more eastern based holistic approach to care and treatment. In western society, the beliefs for treatment seem to be quite different and take a far different approach most of the time. Would these more traditional and holistic beliefs translate into a more western culture? Would this program have a similar effect or simply be pushed aside for a more western approach?

Provide an additional strategy for overcoming the obstacles or challenges in communicating the content of the evaluation reports.

There are a number of methods one may use to disseminate the findings to others. This step can be challenging and present a number of different hurdles one must overcome. One strategy one may suggest could be using multiple strategies. Dudley (2014) suggests that a variety of evaluation reports should be prepared and disseminated that are relevant to different stakeholders, rather than taking the approach that one report “fits all” (p. 310). This approach will help to provide evaluators be prepared for various audiences, and have presentations able to meet the needs of many.

References

Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.

Law, B., & Shek, D. (2011) Process Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Program: Project P.A.T.H.S. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(5) 539-548.