SOCW 6002 Microaggressions Discussion Comment and Response
SOCW 6002 Microaggressions Discussion Comment and Response essay assignment
SOCW 6002 Microaggressions Discussion Comment and Response essay assignment
My professor in the dissection said:
Intersectionality, Non-spoiled Identities and Traumatized Relations
The five principles articulated in the Bucholtz article are critical for our discussions and writings. This first discussion is aimed at getting you to think about these principles. I am going to focus on the first one here, Emergence. In particular, the article emphasizes that sense of self is related to context, it even emerges from the interactions we have therein. I am isolating one idea for you to recall as you go forth: “Throughout the article, we argue for a view of identity that is intersubjectively rather than individually produced and interactionally emergent rather than assigned in an a priori fashion.” (p. 587)
Get solution to your nursing paper : SOCW 6002 Microaggressions Discussion Comment and Response
In the Intersectionality piece, at 5:02 PM, Ivana speaks of microaggressions in a new way for me: she uses the term to refer to being outed by someone who knows she is trans to someone who doesn’t. She considers it a microaggression because there could be violence when her “identity” is exposed. I fond this interesting because her need for the one in the know to keep a secret points clearly to the fact that her identity as trans is dependent on others agreeing to interact with her accordingly.
This situation also touches me deeper, making me feel compassion for the fact that what we may feel insider and need from others in term of acceptance of our inner or personal sense of self still requires us to gain recognition and care, including relationship, with others.
I get something similar to the above feelings–kinship, sadness, awesomeness–when juxtaposing Ivana’s and Adam Gussow’s narratives. Below is the email I received from Aaron that I wanted to share with you last night:
Aaron: I’m blown away by your email. Thanks! As you’ll see, you’re mentioned in my article–the postscript or afterword, if I remember correctly. Your notion of whiteness as a “spoiled racial identity” resonated strongly with me, on both a personal level and an intellectual level. I hope we’ll have a chance to cross paths at some point. I’m honored to have inspired you; as they say, the feeling is mutual. FYI, the long background to my thinking on all this was my enduring partnership with Sterling “Mr. Satan” Magee, a Mississippi-born, Harlem-bred guitarist/percussionist/blues-singer; I wrote about our partnership in “Mister Satan’s Apprentice,” a memoir published in 1998. My interest in discourses of racial reconciliation was provoked not just by insights I gained from that partnership, but, in a negative way, by the tensions of the OJ years (“Two Americas, one black, one white,” on the cover of Newsweek post-trial) and, in a positive way, by my two-year experience in a New Age interfaith church in NY. So I started reading widely, very widely, collected several shelves full of books (including, memorably, Eric Yamamoto’s book, which comes at things from a legal standpoint). Talked about this stuff at several conferences, where nobody quite knew what to make of me. Then, after working up the article you’re now holding, I got that stunning slapdown from an anonymous reviewer for American Literary History–and I set it all aside. During the last year or two I was also in the process of meeting, wooing, and marrying the love of my life, who turned out to be a black Texan. Had a son. We’re still wailing, as Louis Armstrong once said of his own marriage. So the journey was worth it. Be good. –Adam G. (PS: Here’s the link to a documentary about my blues duo, which I haven’t seen but the premiere of which I’ll be attending in NYC on Friday, 4/20. https://www.tribecafilm.com/filmguide/satan-adam-2018
My classmate said:
In the Bucholtz article, I found it interesting that the authors have drawn on several different social theories such as indexicality and social identity theory to understand the construction of identity. After all, identity is the distinguishing character or personality of an individual. For example, identity can be a person’s name, birthplace, or sexual orientation. Indexicality can help people make sense of their everyday lives by describing the context-dependent nature of language and language use. For example, smoke is an indexical sign of fire.
The emergence principle states that identity emerges from conditions of linguistic interaction. Ivana is a black trans women who claimed that she has been harassed and ridiculed by people every day. Our society needs to learn to accept people who identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that asserts how different aspects of social identities combine or overlap to create different modes of discrimination. Many people like Ivana have been misgendered and discriminated against and it needs to end. An individual’s sense of self is a particularly important element of identity.