Reconsidering the ethics of sham interventions in an era of emerging technologies
Needs to be 3 paragraph
Reconsidering the ethics of sham interventions in an era of emerging technologies: Read the following articles.
1. Reconsidering the ethics of sham interventions in an era of emerging technologies. Niemansburg, S., van Delden, J., Dhert, W., Bredenoord, A. (2015).Surgery, 157(4).
2. Henry K. Beecher and the Oversight of Research in Children. Lantos, J. (2016). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 59(1).
3. Ethical issues in the export, storage and reuse of human biological samples in biomedical research: Perspectives of key stakeholders in Ghana and Kenya. Tindana, P, Molyneux CS, Bull, S, Parker, M. (2014). BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1).
Select one of the above articles for this week’s response. Your response needs to include all of the following:
- Summary of the key issue(s) identified in the article you chose.
- Summary of additional information on the issue(s) from another source (i.e, clinical trial results, another article by different author, healthcare group/association position statement, website, etc,).
- Summary of your thoughts on the issue(s). Feel free to share a work/personal experience.
Rubric Criteria
|
Criterion |
1. Unsatisfactory |
2. Less Than Satisfactory |
3. Satisfactory |
4. Good |
5. Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) |
0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. |
2.8 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. |
3.08 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. |
3.22 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. |
3.5 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
|
How the Technology Will Assist in Resolving the Select Clinical Problem How the Technology Will Assist in Resolving the Select Clinical Problem |
0 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is not present. |
8.4 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is present but incomplete. |
9.24 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is present but done at a perfunctory level. |
9.66 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
10.5 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Brief Description of Clinical Problem Brief Description of Clinical Problem |
0 points Brief description of clinical problem is not present. |
5.6 points Brief description of clinical problem is present but incomplete. |
6.16 points Brief description of clinical problem is present but done at a perfunctory level. |
6.44 points Brief description of clinical problem is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
7 points Brief description of clinical problem is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Applicable Theory to Guide Presentation Applicable Theory to Guide Presentation |
0 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is not present. |
8.4 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is present but incomplete. |
9.24 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is present but done at a perfunctory level. |
9.66 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
10.5 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
0 points Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. |
5.6 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. |
6.16 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. |
6.44 points Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. |
7 points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. |
|
Problem-Specific Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes Problem-Specific Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes |
0 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is not present. |
8.4 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is present but incomplete. |
9.24 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is present but done at a perfunctory level. |
9.66 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
10.5 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Presentation of Content Presentation of Content |
0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. |
2.8 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. |
3.08 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. |
3.22 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. |
3.5 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. |
|
Layout Layout |
0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. |
2.8 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. |
3.08 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. |
3.22 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. |
3.5 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
|
Discussion of Potential Strengths and Limitations of the Technology Discussion of Potential Strengths and Limitations of the Technology |
0 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is not present. |
5.6 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is present but incomplete. |
6.16 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is present but done at a perfunctory level. |
6.44 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
7 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
|
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points Sources are not documented. |
5.6 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
6.16 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
6.44 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
7 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |