PSY 693 Week 7 Benchmark Assignment Leadership Reflection Paper

PSY 693 Week 7 Benchmark Assignment Leadership Reflection Paper
Topic 7 Benchmark Assignment – Leadership Reflection Paper
Details:
NOTE: Please review the attached document Leadership Reflection, located under course materials, before beginning this assignment.
In 500-750 words reflect on what you learned from your leadership interview.

Describe what you learned from your interview.
Describe how you will use the information in your own leadership experiences.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide and Typing Template, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 2.4: Evaluate intrapersonal skills.
PSY693-RS-LeadershipReflection.docx

Benchmark Assignment – Leadership Reflection Paper

1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%
2

Less than Satisfactory

74.00%
3

Satisfactory

79.00%
4

Good

87.00%
5

Excellent

100.00%

70.0 %Content
35.0 %Describe what you learned from your interview
of what was learned from the interview is missing.
of what was learned from the interview is vague or inadequate.
of what was learned from the interview is present but somewhat lacks clarity.
of what was learned from the interview is clear and thoughtful.
of what was learned from the interview is clear, thorough, and well-presented.

35.0 %Describe how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences. (Comp 2.4)
of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is missing.
of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is vague or inadequate.
of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is present but somewhat lacks clarity.
of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is clear and thoughtful.
of how you will use this information in your own leadership experiences is clear, thorough, and well-presented.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage