PICOT/PICo and Practice Questions: NR 505 Week 2 Discussion

PICOT/PICo and Practice Questions: NR 505 Week 2 Discussion

PICOT/PICo and Practice Questions: NR 505 Week 2 Discussion

Week 2’s emphasis is on questions: PICOT/PICo and practice questions.

Using your Week 1 topic of interest, identify the following.
Will your EBP project proposal take a quantitative or qualitative approach?
Explain why this method is the best one for providing information in your field of interest.
Create a PICOT/PICo question in the PICOT/PICo format for quantitative approaches and in the PICo format for qualitative approaches.
Determine your practice question, making certain to include the following.
In terms of a quantitative approach,
A part that asks “what is,” “what are,” “is there,” or “are there”
The population under investigation
Variables being investigated
Suggestion for a variable-to-variable relationship
A qualitative approach is required.
Phenomenon or interesting concept
Interested group or population
Which qualitative research design should be used?

Qualitative research is a non-numerical approach to identifying and understanding behaviors and interactions. During the exploratory phase of a research project, techniques that encourage open-ended dialogue with participants are typically used. Allowing participants to form their own responses allows them to use more detail than in closed-ended dialogue. Focus groups, etc.

NR 505 Week 2 Discussion PICOT PICo and Practice Questions

Qualitative data is gathered through the use of surveys, in-depth interviews, and mystery shopping. Qualitative data allows the researcher to have detailed interactions with research participants, allowing a wide range of information to be revealed. The data could be useful to companies developing new products and services (Winters, 2016). In contrast, quantitative research seeks patterns in numerical data that can be used to clarify research hypotheses. Statistical data give researchers the information they need to make educated statements about the results. This method is more structured and collects information through closed-ended questions. The survey is the most commonly used tool for collecting data for a quantitative study, whether it is done via mail, phone, online, or a combination of the three (Winters, 2016).

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : PICOT/PICo and Practice Questions: NR 505 Week 2 Discussion

For my research EBP project proposal, I intend to conduct qualitative research. My research question seeks to determine whether the use and implementation of electronic health records improves collaboration among healthcare providers. This information must be gathered through in-depth conversations. According to Winters (2016), qualitative data enables researchers to engage in in-depth discussions with study participants, which can provide insight into their needs, behaviors, desires, routines, and a variety of other details. The data gathered may be useful in updating or developing a system that providers will find more user-friendly, resulting in increased compliance, collaboration, improved patient care, and better patient outcomes.

Is there a link between the use of electronic health records and increased collaboration and better patient care?

<

Looking for nursing papers writing help? Top Nursing Papers Writing Service Online is here. A team of professional nursing essay writers ready to help. Relieve academic stress! With you all through your education course. There is no nursing subject we cannot handle.

 

 

RESPONSE TO PICOT/PICo AND PRACTICE QUESTIONS EXAMPLE

Thank you so much for your feedback. I, too, am enthralled by the implementation and utilization of electronic health records. I’ve been able to participate in several “go live” sessions for electronic health record systems. Much of the resistance, in my experience, stemmed from fear of change. In the last facility I worked in, every physician’s group was given a year to learn and use the new computer documentation system. Except for one, all of the groups complied. And their chief of staff was adamant about not using it, as were the other doctors in the group. Their nurse practitioners, on the other hand, picked up on the system quickly. It was an enthralling situation. Despite the opposition, many of those same doctors were pleased to discover the level of convenience afforded them by being able to remotely enter orders, view lab results, and radiological reports! The floor nurses, in comparison, resisted the transition to computer documentation as well, but we had to learn it right away. There were no discussions about nursing system concerns. Many nurses were skeptical of the new technology at first, but they eventually came to appreciate it. Their trust and appreciation were on full display when the system crashed and we were forced to chart on paper for two days. Despite the difficulties associated with the transition to computer documentation, both nurses and doctors recognized the positive impact it had on the admission process, order entry, patient care, and care transition. According to Lambooij, Drewes, and Koster (2017), the most influential factors in the successful use and implementation of electronic health records were the education and training received by new users, the level of support provided by the IT team, and organizational culture.

Because of ongoing changes in healthcare and federal mandates, organizations must become more adept at introducing and implementing electronic health records.

The more positive the communication surrounding the EHR, the more positive the reception, and the greater the likelihood of the organization’s successful and positive transition.

After all, the most important factor in this equation is the ability to provide better patient care and disease management. Doctors and nurses are more likely to use and improve their workflow if they find a program that is simple to use and relevant to their needs. They also believe that by making electronic medical records more user-friendly and better aligned with their daily routines, patient data quality will improve (Lambooij, Drewes, & Koster, 2017).