PICOT evidence appraisal paper on effect on nursing retention rate
PICOT evidence appraisal paper on effect on nursing retention rate writing help
PICOT evidence appraisal paper on effect on nursing retention rate
• Practice Issue/PICOT – in this section students will make an objective case for the issue under study, describe the current practice and outcome limitations, and present alternatives for consideration.
• Search – in this section students will describe the evidence search in narrative form. This will allow others to reproduce the search and verify authenticity
• Retrieval – in this section students will retrieve the highest level and quality relevant evidence, either to support or not support the use of the intervention. Retrieve the best evidence regardless of the findings. High level, high quality research that fails to show an affect is as equally important as research that does.
• Appraisal – read each study retrieved, extracting key information regarding the design, methods, and outcomes of each study. Use the posted ERT Template to organize and present the appraisal
ORDER A CUSTOM PICOT ASSIGNMENT from the best nursing writers
Grading will be completed by the section faculty in accordance with the grading rubric provided in the course syllabus
PICO(T) 1: Evidence Search, Retrieval, and Appraisal Grading Rubric
Submit on Blackboard under Assignment Tab, through SafeAssign
If approved, students may use their writing from the PICOT Development Guide and DB 1 and 2
Section Content Potential Points Points
Practice Issue Discuss a healthcare problem that adversely affects patients, healthcare providers, or a system. Describe the impact of the problem, providing outcome data to demonstrate significance 1
Describe the current practice/approach related to the topic and effectiveness. Identify limitations of the current practice and implications with data support 2
Discuss possible practice alternatives, including the PICO(T) intervention, with implications for improved patient outcomes. 1
PICO(T)
PICO(T) question was approved and describes the specific population and setting, intervention, comparison (current practice), measurable outcome, and time (if applicable) 1
Evidence Search Describe search strategy, keywords and/or MESH terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, number citations retrieved, and number rejected w/rationale. Search is reproducible, used appropriate database(s), OneSearch not permitted. One bibliographic database required: two recommended 2
Evidence Retrieval Retrieve 4 primary, prospective, intervention research studies (a SR/MA may be an optional 5th study)
Use of Quality Improvement, pilot studies are not permitted 4
Each study reflects population/setting, intervention, outcome components of the approved PICOT 2
Evidence Review Table
(ERT)
Construct an Evidence Review Table to describe the purpose, design, sample, intervention, outcome measures, results of 4 retrieved primary research study (provide as Appendix A – do not submit as a separate document)
1-point deduction for ERT > 4 pages 8
Each study is accurately leveled with rationale provided for leveling designation. (use Melnyk p. 18) 1
Writing Quality Writing is clear, organized, with correct English composition. APA 7 professional format, Word document (no PDFs), New Times Roman 12 pt font (table single spaced, 10 pt font)., 2–3 page limit excluding title page, references, and Appendix. References published within 7 years 3