Patient Safety Discussion

This assignment asks students to demonstrate their newly acquired information literacy and resource utilization skills to explore a concept that is critical to nursing. The end product of this assignment is a paper written following the style guidelines of the American Psychological Association (APA) as learned in class. Download the Transitions Paper Guidelines (Links to an external site.) here. Submit your assignment by the due date and time set by your faculty member. Rubric RUA: Transitions Paper RUA: Transitions Paper Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction Required criteria: 1. Clearly establishes the purpose of the paper 2. Includes key points to be covered 3. Captures the reader’s interest Ratings 20 pts Highest Level of Performance Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 19 pts High Level of Performance Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. 15 pts Satisfactory Includes no less than 1 requirement for section. 7 pts Unsatisfactory Present, yet includes no required criteria. 0 pts Section n present i No requi for this s presented RUA: Transitions Paper Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody of Paper Required criteria: 1.

Provides a complete, well-developed discussion of key points from the article using appropriate citations. 2. Ideas and statements are supported by three or more examples from personal and/or professional experiences 3. Provides own perspectives on the topic that is reflective, insightful, and original 4. Logical development of ideas with clear and accurate information 60 pts Highest Level of Performance Includes 4 requirements for section. 55 pts High Level of Performance Includes 3 requirements for section. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion Required criteria: 1. Clear and concise 2. Summarizes key points discussed in the paper 3. Leaves a strong impression, message, or idea on the reader 30 pts Highest Level of Performance Includes 3 requirements for section. 27 pts High Level of Performance Includes 2 requirements for section. 46 pts Satisfactory Includes 2 requirements for section. 23 pts Satisfactory Includes 1 requirement for section. 23 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1 requirement for section. 0 pts Section no present in No require for this sec presented. 12 pts Unsatisfactory Section present yet includes no required criteria. 0 pts Section no present in No require for this sec presented. RUA: Transitions Paper Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style Required criteria: 1. Correct use of standard English grammar, paragraph, and sentence structure 2. No spelling or typographical errors 3. Organized around required components 4. Information flows in a logical sequence that is easy for the reader to follow 5.

Patient Safety Discussion

Paper is no more than two pages (not including the title or reference page) Ratings 15 pts Highest Level of Performance Includes 5 requirements for section. 14 pts High Level of Performance Includes 4 requirements for section. 11 pts Satisfactory Includes 3 requirements for section. 6 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1-2 requirement for section. 0 pts Section no present in No require for this sec presented. RUA: Transitions Paper Criteria This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization Required criteria: 1. There is correct and appropriate use of margins, spacing, font, and headers. 2. Document setup includes title and reference pages in correct APA format. 3. Citations of sources included in the body of the paper use correct APA format for direct quotes and paraphrased information. 4. Sources are cited correctly on the Reference page. All elements of each reference are included in the correct order. 5. All information taken from the source, even if summarized, must be cited and the article must be listed on the Reference page according to APA. 6. All sources used are nursing journals published within the last five years. Total Points: 150 Ratings 25 pts Highest Level of Performance Includes 6 requirements for section. 23 pts High Level of Performance Includes 5 requirements for section. 19 pts Satisfactory Includes 3-4 requirements for section. 9 pts Unsatisfactory Includes 1-2 requirements for section. 0 pts Section no present in No require for this sec presented. NR103 Transition to the Nursing Profession Transitions Paper Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to explore a critical concept in nursing.

The student will be able to demonstrate application of information literacy and ability to utilize resources (library, writing center, Center for Academic Success [CAS], APA resources, Turnitin, and others) through literature search and writing the paper. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 2: Identify characteristics of professional behavior including emotional intelligence, communication, and conflict resolution. CO 3: Demonstrate information literacy and the ability to utilize resources. Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 150 points Preparing the assignment Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. 1) Locating Evidence a. Using the Chamberlain University library, search for a recent (published within the last five years) evidencebased article from a scholarly journal that addresses one of the topics listed. • Safety • Delegation • Prioritization • Caring 2) Include the following sections. a. Introduction – 20 points/13% • Clearly establishes the purpose of the paper • Includes key points to be covered • Captures the reader’s interest b. Body of Paper – 60 points/40% • Provides a complete, well-developed discussion of key points from the article using appropriate citations. • Ideas and statements are supported by three or more examples from personal and/or professional experiences • Provides own perspectives on the topic that is reflective, insightful, and original • Logical development of ideas with clear and accurate information c. Conclusion – 30 points/20% • Clear and concise • Summarizes key points discussed in the paper • Leaves a strong impression, message, or idea on the reader d. Writing Style – 15 point/10% • Correct use of standard English grammar, paragraph, and sentence structure • No spelling or typographical errors • Organized around required components • Information flows in a logical sequence that is easy for the reader to follow • Paper should be no more than two pages (not including the title or reference page) e. APA Format and Reference Page – 25 points/17% • There is correct and appropriate use of margins, spacing, font, and headers. NR103_Transitions_Paper_Guidelines Revised May 2021 1 NR103 Transition to the Nursing Profession Transitions Paper Guidelines • • • • • Document setup includes title and reference pages in correct APA format. Citations of sources included in the body of the paper use correct APA format for direct quotes and paraphrased information. Sources are cited correctly on the Reference page. All elements of each reference are included in the correct order. All information taken from the source, even if summarized, must be cited, and the article must be listed on the Reference page according to APA. All sources used are nursing journals published within the last five years To stay up to date on proper citation guidelines, use https://apastyle.apa.org/ (Links to an external site.) and APA support tool APA Academic Writer https://academicwriter-apa-org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/ Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned.

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : Patient Safety Discussion

NR103_Transitions_Paper_Guidelines Revised May 2021 2 NR103 Transition to the Nursing Profession Transitions Paper Guidelines Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Introduction (20 points/13%) Required criteria 1. Clearly establishes the purpose of the paper 2. Includes key points to be covered 3. Captures the reader’s interest Body of Paper – 60 points/40% (60 points/40%) 1. 2. 3. 4. Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper 20 points 19 points 15 points 7 points 0 points Includes no less than 1 requirement for section. Present, yet includes no required criteria. No requirements for this section presented. 46 points 23 points 0 points Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. 60 points Includes 4 Required criteria Provides a complete, well-developed discussion of requirements for section. key points from the article using appropriate citations. Ideas and statements are supported by three or more examples from personal and/or professional experiences Provides own perspectives on the topic that is reflective, insightful, and original Logical development of ideas with clear and accurate information Conclusion (30 points/20%) Required criteria 1. Clear and concise 2. Summarizes key points discussed in the paper 3. Leaves a strong impression, message, or idea on the reader NR103_Transitions_Paper_Guidelines Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. 55 points Includes 3 requirements for section. 30 points Includes 3 requirements for section. 27 points Includes 2 requirements for section. Revised May 2021 Includes 2 requirements for section. 23 points Includes 1 requirement for section. Includes 1 requirements for section. 12 points Section present yet includes no required criteria. No requirements for this section presented. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. 3 NR103 Transition to the Nursing Profession Transitions Paper Guidelines Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Writing Style (15 points/10%) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper 15 points 14 points 11 points 6 points 0 points Includes 5 Required criteria requirements for 1. Correct use of standard English grammar, section. paragraph, and sentence structure 2. No spelling or typographical errors 3. Organized around required components 4. Information flows in a logical sequence that is easy for the reader to follow 5. Paper is no more than two pages (not including the title or reference page) APA Format and Reference Page (25 points/10%) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Includes 4 requirements for section. 25 points Includes 6 Required criteria There is correct and appropriate use of margins, requirements for section. spacing, font, and headers. Document setup includes title and reference pages in correct APA format. Citations of sources included in the body of the paper use correct APA format for direct quotes and paraphrased information. Sources are cited correctly on the Reference page. All elements of each reference are included in the correct order. All information taken from the source, even if summarized, must be cited and the article must be listed on the Reference page according to APA. All sources used are nursing journals published within the last five years. Includes 3 requirements for section. 23 points Includes 5 requirements for section. 19 points Includes 3-4 requirements for section. Includes 1-2 requirement for section. 9 Points Includes 1-2 requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. 0 points No requirements for this section presented. Total Points Possible = 150 points NR103_Transitions_Paper_Guidelines Revised May 2021 4 FROM THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ed improvement in the hospital work environment reported by nurses between 2005 and 2016. Yet in those hospitals where the work environment improved, “both patients and nurses reported favorable changes in quality and safety and patient experiences.” DOI : 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.1239 Patient Safety BY ALAN R. WEIL H ealth care systems have made significant efforts to reduce patient harm due to errors in the nearly two decades since the Institute of Medicine’s To Err Is Human report. Yet our understanding of the scale and types of preventable error has grown, as has our awareness of the varied settings in which harm can occur. As David Bates and Hardeep Singh write in this issue devoted to the topic of patient safety: “The next challenge in patient safety is the development and implementation of tools and strategies that enable organizations to measure and reduce harm both inside and outside the hospital, continuously and routinely.” Improving Safety William Berry and colleagues describe the complex process of taking a safety improvement practice (in this case, using a surgical safety checklist) and implementing it across all South Carolina hospitals. Even though most of the participants in the safety program were nurses, it was CEO and physician involvement that was associated with successful program implementation. Three Medicare value-based payment programs include incentives to reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Shawna Smith and colleagues explain that the administrative data Medicare uses to measure hospital performance show a much lower incidence of pressure ulcers than is revealed by a standardized chart review. Both methods show a decline in pressure ulcer frequency between 2009 and 2014, but the authors’ analysis indicates that the vast majority of the decline shown in administrative data was in early-stage pressure ulcers, which are less costly and less severe than those in later stages. Kelsey Flott and colleagues describe efforts to build a safety culture at a large National Health Service hospital in London to improve adverse incident reporting. A key feature of the effort was “respecting staff authority as commensurate to that of other stakeholders,” which helped “solicit honest and helpful views.” David Classen and colleagues show the potential of using real-time data generated by a hospital electronic health record (EHR) to “detect safety problems as they occur and predict them before they happen.”

Patient Safety Discussion

Data from the EHR identified more than ten times as many harmful events as traditional administrative reporting methods did. New analytic methods improved the prediction of adverse events, which could enable timely interventions with the potential to reduce patient harm. Role Of The Patient Anjana Sharma and colleagues review the literature on patient engagement in efforts to improve safety. The authors identify critical research gaps but also note that “patient engagement safety initiatives are being implemented and tested in a diverse range of care settings. No study has shown evidence of harm from patient engagement, and many have shown improvements in safety outcomes.” Analyzing data on diagnostic errors reported by patients to a patient advocacy organization, Traber Davis Giardina and colleagues identify “four themes of problematic behavior: ignoring patients’ knowledge, disrespecting patients, failing to communicate, and engaging in manipulation or deception.” Linda Aiken and colleagues find limit- Improving Systems Pascale Carayon and colleagues explain how the discipline of human factors and systems engineering (HF/SE) is increasingly being applied to improve systems to advance safety. Noting that “cultural differences between HF/SE and health care are profoundly important but often unrecognized or underappreciated,” the authors offer a number of recommendations for bridging this divide. Anjali Joseph and colleagues review the literature showing how the physical design of health care facilities can reduce the incidence of infections, patient falls, and medication errors. They note that most research focuses on hospitals, with far less known about how outpatient care, long-term care facilities, and home care can be designed to minimize medical errors. Margaret Smith and colleagues explore the hospital characteristics related to death rates due to “failure to rescue” subsequent to postsurgical complications, which are highly variable across hospitals. Based upon interviews with clinicians, the authors conclude that reducing mortality is heavily dependent upon two microsystems: early identification of patient distress and effective communication among members of the care team. Acknowledgments Health Affairs thanks David Bates of Brigham and Women’s Hospital for serving as theme issue adviser.We thank the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for its financial support of this issue. With this issue we launch our new Leading To Health series, which reports on how leaders are creating a culture of health, supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. ▪ N ov em b e r 2 0 1 8 37:11 Health Affairs 1723 Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. University of Groningen Ten years of the Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology Preckel, Benedikt; Staender, Sven; Arnal, Daniel; Brattebo, Guttorm; Feldman, Jeffrey M.; Ffrench-O’Carroll, Robert; Fuchs-Buder, Thomas; Goldhaber-Fiebert, Sara N.; Haller, Guy; Haugen, Arvid S. Published in: European Journal of Anaesthesiology DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001244 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher’s version (publisher’s PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2020 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Preckel, B., Staender, S., Arnal, D., Brattebo, G., Feldman, J. M., Ffrench-O’Carroll, R., Fuchs-Buder, T., Goldhaber-Fiebert, S. N., Haller, G., Haugen, A. S., Hendrickx, J. F. A., Kalkman, C. J., Meybohm, P., Neuhaus, C., Ostergaard, D., Plunkett, A., Schuler, H. U., Smith, A. F., Struys, M. M. R. F., … Mellin-Olsen, J. (2020). Ten years of the Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology: An expert opinion on peri-operative safety aspects. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 37(7), 521-610. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001244 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverneamendment. Patient Safety Discussion

Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37:521–610 REVIEW ARTICLE Ten years of the Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology An expert opinion on peri-operative safety aspects Downloaded from https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 01/07/2021 Benedikt Preckel, Sven Staender, Daniel Arnal, Guttorm Brattebø, Jeffrey M. Feldman, Robert Ffrench-O’Carroll, Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Sara N. Goldhaber-Fiebert, Guy Haller, Arvid S. Haugen, Jan F.A. Hendrickx, Cor J. Kalkman, Patrick Meybohm, Christopher Neuhaus, Doris Østergaard, Adrian Plunkett, Hans U. Schüler, Andrew F. Smith, Michel M.R.F. Struys, Christian P. Subbe, Johannes Wacker, John Welch, David K. Whitaker, Kai Zacharowski and Jannicke Mellin-Olsen Patient safety is an activity to mitigate preventable patient harm that may occur during the delivery of medical care. The European Board of Anaesthesiology (EBA)/European Union of Medical Specialists had previously published safety recommendations on minimal monitoring and postanaesthesia care, but with the growing public and professional interest it was decided to produce a much more encompassing document. The EBA and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a consensus on what needs to be done/achieved for improvement of peri-operative patient safety. During the Euroanaesthesia meeting in Helsinki/Finland in 2010, this vision was presented to anaesthesiologists, patients, industry and others involved in health care as the ‘Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology’. In May/June 2020, ESA and EBA are celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology; a good opportunity to look back and forward evaluating what was achieved in the recent 10 years, and what needs to be done in the upcoming years. The Patient Safety and Quality Committee (PSQC) of ESA invited experts in their fields to contribute, and these experts addressed their topic in different ways; there are classical, narrative reviews, more systematic reviews, political statements, personal opinions and also original data presentation. With this publication we hope to further stimulate implementation of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology, as well as initiating relevant research in the future. Published online 1 June 2020 From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (BP), Institute for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spital Männedorf AG, Männedorf, Switzerland (SS), Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria (SS), Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Fundaci on Alcorc on Madrid, Spain (DA), Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital (GB, ASH), Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (GB), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (JMF), Anaesthetic Department, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (RF-OC),

Patient Safety Discussion

Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University de Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France (TF-B), Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA (SNG-F), Department of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland (GH), Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (GH), Department of Anesthesiology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital Aalst, Aalst, Belgium (JFAH), Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (CJK), Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine & Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt (PM, KZ), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg (PM), Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (CN), Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (DØ), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (DØ), Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (AP), Product Management Anesthesiology, Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA, Lübeck, Germany (HUS), Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK (AFS), Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands (MMRFS), Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (MMRFS), Department of Acute Medicine, Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital, Bangor, UK (CPS), School of Medical Science, Bangor University, Bangor, UK (CPS), Institute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care IFAI, Hirslanden Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland (JWa), Department of Critical Care, University College Hospital, London (JWe), Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK (DKW) and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Baerum Hospital, Sandvika, Norway (JM-O) Correspondence to Benedikt Preckel, Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: b.preckel@amsterdamumc.nl 0265-0215 Copyright ß 2020 European Society of Anaesthesiology. All rights reserved. DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001244 Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. 522 Preckel et al. Table of Contents Introduction (Arnal, Preckel)

24/7 Nursing Homework Help

Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!

Patient Safety Discussion