NURS 8502 Week 5 Assignment 4: Identify Search Strategy
NURS 8502 Week 5 Assignment 4 Identify Search Strategy
NURS 8502 Week 5 Assignment 4: Identify Search Strategy
How will you find the necessary evidence for your practice problem? If you are exploring sources outside of “typical” avenues, how do you know where to look?
Understanding where and how to search for evidence is an important first step in exploring sources. A search strategy can benefit your search efforts by providing a necessary framework to begin. As a nurse leader, developing strategy—in this instance a search strategy—can demonstrate your leadership skills as you work to support a practice change that addresses a practice problem.
For this Identify Search Strategy Assignment, consider the importance of developing a search strategy to find the necessary evidence for your practice problem. How might this development of a search strategy connect to your leadership strategies and styles? Consider the importance of search exploration for finding the necessary evidence for your practice problem.
To Prepare
- Review the Learning Resources covering source exploration.
- Explore search strategies to determine what will work best for your problem.
- Consider the connection between source exploration, search strategies, and leadership styles.
The Assignment: (1–2 pages)
Construct a short paper in which you identify the search strategy you will use to gather evidence for your practice problem. Why did you select this search strategy, and how will this strategy be most beneficial for the problem? How did your role as leader assist you in making this decision? Be specific and provide examples.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn4+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment 4 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment 4 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn4+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with NURS 8502 Week 5 Assignment 4: Identify Search Strategy. Write my nursing paper
To access your rubric:
Week 5 Assignment 4 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 5 Assignment 4 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 5 Assignment 4
Name: NURS_8502_Week5_Assignment 4 Identify Search Strategy Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Identify the search strategy you will use to gather evidence for the problem. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response comprehensively and clearly identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem.
|
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response clearly identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem
|
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the search strategy that will be used to gather evidence for the problem, or it is missing.
|
Explain why you selected the search strategy. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response comprehensively and clearly explains the selection of the search strategy. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection process. |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response clearly explains the selection of the search strategy. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection process. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the selection of the search strategy. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection process. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the selection of the search strategy, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection process, or it is missing. |
Justify why the search strategy is the most beneficial for the identified problem. |
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response comprehensively and fully justifies the use of the selected search strategy. The response comprehensively and clearly explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the use of the search strategy. |
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response clearly justifies the use of the selected search strategy. The response clearly explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the use of the search strategy. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely justifies the use of the selected search strategy. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the use of the search strategy. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely justifies the use of the selected search strategy, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the search strategy approach will better inform improvements for identified problem, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support use of the search strategy, or it is missing. |
Explain how your role as a leader assisted in your search strategy decision. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and clearly explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation. |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the leadership role assisted in the decision making, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing. |
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|