NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 2: Journal Entry 1
NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 2 Journal Entry 1
NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 2: Journal Entry 1
Submit a journal entry (along with your time log). The journal entry is your opportunity to be self-reflective and needs to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area, and this week’s Learning Resources, for a complete description of the practicum.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment 2 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3
To participate in this Assignment:
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with NURS 8502 Week 3 Assignment 2: Journal Entry 1
Week 3 Assignment 2
Name: NURS_8502_Week3_Assignment2_Journal Entry 1 Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reflect on the practicum experience hours completed. |
Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The response comprehensively and clearly reflects on the practicum experience. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the reflection. |
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response clearly reflects on the practicum experience. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the reflection. |
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely reflects on the practicum experience. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the reflection. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely reflects on the practicum experience, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is missing. |
Complete the Practicum Time Log. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 40 (40%)
A completed Practicum Time Log is submitted.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
An incomplete Practicum Time Log is submitted, or it is missing.
|
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
|
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|