NURS 8200 Week 10 Discussion 2: Coding of Qualitative Data
NURS 8200 Week 10 Discussion 2: Coding of Qualitative Data
NURS 8200 Week 10 Discussion 2: Coding of Qualitative Data
NURS 8200 Week 10 Discussion 2: Coding of Qualitative
Data
Analyzing qualitative data after it has been collected begins with a process known as coding.
This involves reviewing the data that was collected and identifying important passages and
information. The researcher can then group those passages according to their respective topics
and develop specific themes about those topics that are supported by the data. This process
involves careful thought and a great deal of discipline.
It is easy for researchers to manipulate
passages and themes to support their hypotheses and expectations. This is problematic for several
reasons: It promotes biased results, it limits the scope and depth of the analysis, and it makes the
discussion and defense of the researcher’s techniques rather difficult.
This Discussion allows you to experience the processes of coding and analyzing qualitative data.
In doing so, you should gain a deeper understanding of these techniques and their challenges.
To prepare:
Select at least five of your classmates’ Introduction posts from the Class Café to code and
analyze.
Using the strategies presented in the Smith and Firth article, code your five selected
postings by removing identifying information, coding the information, and identifying
specific themes. As you begin the process, keep in mind that there is no right or wrong
way of coding; however, your categories and associated data should—without heavy
explanation—make sense to someone unfamiliar with your research.
When you have completed coding the data, reflect on your experience of analyzing this
type of data. Ask yourself: How can qualitative research methods promote evidence-
based practice?
By Day 5
Post a cohesive response that addresses the following:
Identify the overall themes you selected from coding the posts. Justify why you chose
these particular themes. Try to be as scholarly as possible and remember that researchers
try to refrain from directly identifying the subjects of their qualitative studies.
Formulate a brief analysis and conclusion about your classmates’ Introduction posts
based on the themes you identified.
Discuss what you gained from your experiences with coding and analyzing qualitative
data and how qualitative research can promote evidence-based practice.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 7
Respond to at least two of your colleagues, critiquing their research question and hypotheses
and pointing out factors that may influence the strength of the correlation of the variables. Be
sure to provide a rationale for your responses in one or more of the following ways:
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence,
or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information
to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from
your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after
synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting
perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Note: Please see the Course Syllabus and Discussion Posting and Response Rubric for formal
Discussion question posting and response evaluation criteria.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what
you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and
any additional sources.
Post your responses to the Discussion based on the course requirements.
Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA
guidelines as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support
your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly
sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure
your in-text citations and reference list are correct. Initial postings must be 250–350 words (not
including references).
GET PAPER HELP. PLACE AN ORDER FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NURS 8200 Week 10 Discussion 2: Coding of Qualitative Data
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment :
Count on our trustworthy online nursing writing service
Rely on the assistance of our expert nursing essay writers. Papers that are free of plagiarism, delivered on time, and supported at all hours are all part of our writing service.
Time to ease academic pressure. Top nursing acers will handle your urgent nursing projects, so you never have to. Our online nursing essay service is here to help you.
Need help writing a nursing paper? We’re the best. Our nursing writers are ready for any nursing task.
The finest place to get nursing essays and assignments.
Our experienced nursing paper writers can write about any nursing, biochemistry, biology, chemistry, pedagogy, gynecology, medicine & health, healthcare, nutrition, or pharmacology topic.