Walden University – NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Walden University – NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Walden University – NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Initial Post-Discussion Week 1 HD

Collapse

Nursing is a profession which is widely trusted by the community at large. One reason nurses are trusted is because of their focus on the human who is receiving care. I view nursing as a humanity with the experience of science. Not all of nursing is a strict science and that drives my philosophy of nursing (McEwen & Wills, 2019).  My philosophy of nursing is grounded in kindness which most closely aligns to esthetics. While on the surface this seems logical and easy, it is often the most difficult way to provide care. As a nurse I have worked in many different settings and have been in many different roles. What works when caring for the child in a doctor’s office does not easily translate to the adult preparing for open heart surgery. Kindness is the common denominator to all my areas of nursing. It stretches from my care of my patients, to dealing with executives, to physicians who are opposed to change, and co-workers who are having a bad day. Kindness is the overarching tool that is often seen in nurses and appears to be the secret to success. When you approach each patient as if they are your loved one and you want the best for them, you give the best care. When you approach an executive with kindness and help them with whatever the common goal is, you will see a better outcome. When working with physicians, kindness will sometimes be viewed as weakness until they see that your kindness is rooted in the understanding that they have a difficult job and often their lack of kindness is a survival technique. Most importantly kindness is special to nursing in that our co-workers who often go overlooked need to be treated with kindness. In my current roll the morale is low due to understaffing related to our COVID status. Many people left the nursing home setting as they had great fear. Many of the staff in this setting were making more money not working and thus it became an easy choice for them. With this swift shift in staffing, kindness has been more important as those who have remained are feeling the pain. Often kindness these days is a simple thank you, helping them do a task that is generally in their job description alone, or by simply listening to their frustrations. Story after story can be told of how kindness changed an outcome in my career. Helping others and seeing their point of view is kindness to me. Today I was caring for a resident who happens to be a nurse and she asked me a pointed question, “Do you treat all of your residents as well as you treat me?” What a question, I was thankful to know she felt my philosophy of nursing and chose today to mention it.  I responded with my goal to always treat my patients and co-workers as well as I can, and she confirmed in me that I am on the right path. Nursing care is often thankless and being a patient is not easy, sharing kindness allows all involved to be happy and improves health.

One area of my philosophy I am working to exercise more is how to show myself kindness. As a nurse many of us have gone without food, water, and bathroom breaks as we strive to provide the care for others however this is contrary to my philosophy of nursing. If I want to be kind, then I must also be kind to myself. To remember and practice this, I have made kindness to myself a new area of growth. It is not kind to skip meals and then wonder why you are not able to be your best self. It is not kind to skip drinking for an entire shift and then be ill the next day. Kindness in my nursing philosophy is rooted in kindness to others and I am now learning how to maintain that and extend the circle to include me on a personal level.

While I know my philosophy needs more definition, I think kindness is needed for social change. Often change is forced on people with little change. Without kindness change is rarely successful.

NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice Reference

McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical Basis for Nursing 5th Edition.

For this first course Discussion, you will present a philosophy of nursing practice that draws on your experience, area(s) of expertise, and beliefs. Looking ahead to your role as a DNP, also consider how to expand your awareness of issues beyond your own current practice—such as regarding diversity, global health, collaboration—and how to fulfill the Walden requirement to advocate for social change.

In short, begin now to commit to a higher level of contribution and practice as a DNP and to reflect that commitment in your philosophy of nursing practice for today and the future. As you continue through the course, note this image will appear with each Discussion and indicates an opportunity to connect your thinking with that of colleagues, for learning with and from one another.

To prepare NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice Paper:

  • Review the Week 1 Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the Chapter 1 reading from McEwen and Wills, “Philosophy, Science, and Nursing.”
  • Reflect on your nursing experience, expertise you have developed, and beliefs about nursing and nursing practice you have formed as a result.
  • Consider how your philosophy of nursing practice is shaped by these elements.
  • Consider goals for expanding your professional awareness through the DNP program and the requirement as a Walden student to be an advocate for social change. How can your philosophy of nursing practice support you in these areas? How can these goals and Walden social change requirement enrich your philosophy of nursing practice?

With these thoughts in mind …

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post an explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice that briefly describes your nursing experience and area(s) of expertise. Be sure to explain your beliefs that inform your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embrace of diversity, global health issues, collaboration). Then, explain the DNP role as a social change agent and recommend at least one way you will advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP. Be specific and provide examples, with all citations in APA 7 style.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days. Choose colleagues with different life experiences and beliefs from your own, and contrast how these factors have shaped their philosophies compared with yours. Also comment on their goals for expanding their experience, practice, and social change advocacy with suggestions or guidance based on your experience. Be specific and provide examples.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Get assistance with your philosophy paper

Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

NURS 8114 Week 1 Discussion: Philosophy of Nursing Practice Rubric Grading Criteria

Excellent

90%–100%

Good

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Poor

0%–69%

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_8114 _Discussion_ Rubric

Week 1 post
As I reflect on my professional experience working both as a registered nurse and also a nurse practitioner, I have noticed that people who excel in their profession are the ones that not only treat the ailment or disease process but also the individual as well. Nursing includes several different classifications of sciences that range from physical to abstract components and it is simply not enough to just treat disease but also consider the human aspects of the person as well (McEwen, M., & Wills, E.M. (2019).

Where it is that I would like to excel is treating more the human side of each individual. I have noticed more and more, new practitioners simply focus on the disease and treatment. What needs to be addressed also is the motivations, desires, and obstacles that the patient will encounter. Most of us do want to live a better, healthier more meaningful life. However, when we set into the world and deal with temptations to cheat on our diets or give into different vices that worsen our conditions we are equipped with the proper tools and methods to continue our healthier lifestyle.

For example, some people might see a diet as giving up certain delicious foods and nothing more. Now if you talk to them about being able to walk their daughters down the aisle later in life rather than some stranger cause your life was cut short, that might give them the motivation to be better. They might then see their challenge as gaining something rather than giving something up. To summarize, treat the ailment and the individual with counseling and a newfound motivation is a lot better than simply giving them the lab results and a pill.

McEwen, M., & Wills, E.M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.) Wolters Kluwer.

24/7 Nursing Homework Help

Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!

Get nursing paper writing help