Walden University – NURS 8110 Week 6: Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

Order an original top nursing paper on Walden University – NURS 8110 Week 6: Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

Walden University – NURS 8110 Week 6: Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

Nurses prepared at the doctoral level can serve as leaders in applying research to nursing practice. How do you think literature reviews could aid in this process?

Systematic reviews involve an in-depth examination of the research literature on a specific topic. To do this successfully, you must be able to employ good search techniques, critique a research article (which requires a foundational understanding of research designs), and understand levels of evidence. This week, you will consider systematic reviews and their usefulness for promoting evidence-based nursing practice.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Employ basic and advanced search techniques to locate research literature on a practice problem
• Critically appraise research literature related to a nursing treatment or prevention intervention (include an article presenting a systematic review)

GET THE SOLUTION TO THE PAPER. ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NURS 8110 Week 6: Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

This Assignment expands upon the work you have been conducting for this week’s Discussion.) you will conduct a search for literature on your selected practice problem. A Literature Review Matrix template will be used to identify gaps in the literature.

To prepare:

Consider the practice problem you addressed in this week’s Discussion. (You may select a new issue if necessary, but it is not recommended): Practice problem chosen: Health literacy and self-care activities, self-efficacy, and health related outcome of patients with type 2 Diabetes.

Review the guidelines in the Literature Review Matrix, included in the Learning Resources.

Get solution to your nursing paper NURS 81 Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

Formulate a research question around your issue as indicated in Part I. Then  complete Part II of the Matrix, identifying the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings.

Using the Walden Library, locate 10 articles related to your research question. At least one article must be a systematic review.

All of the articles should be primary sources. NOTE: If appropriate, you may use the four articles you reviewed for this week’s Discussion.

Actual Assignment:

Complete Part I and Part II of the Literature Review Matrix template.

Begin working on Part III.

Review Part III of the Literature Review Matrix and notice which middle range theories were used most frequently in the articles you reviewed.

Consider the appropriate use of the theoretical frameworks in each article.

Review the information on empiricism presented in Chapter 1 of Theoretical Basis for Nursing and Chapter 6 in The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence as you consider your response to Part IV.

Complete Part III of the Literature Review Matrix.

In your analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature, note the appropriate use of the theoretical frameworks.

Complete Part IV addressing the influence of empiricism on quantitative methodology.

REFERENCES

McEwin, M., & Wills, E.M. (2014). Theoretical basis for nursing. (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.

Chapter 10, “Introduction to Middle Range Nursing Theories”

Chapter 11, “Overview of Selected Middle Range Nursing Theories”

Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.

Chapter 3, “Introduction to Quantitative Research”

Chapter 4, “Introduction to Qualitative Research”

Chapter 6 guides nurses through the process of identifying research objectives, developing research questions, and creating research hypotheses.

Chapter 7 examines the process of preparing for a literature review to support research efforts.

Chapter 13, “Outcomes Research”

Moran, K., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2017). The doctor of nursing practice scholarly project: A framework for success (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Review Chapter 6, “Developing the Scholarly Project”

Armola, R., Bourgault, A., Halm, M., Board, R., Bucher, L., Harrington, L., & … Medina, J. (2009). AACN levels of evidence: What’s new? Critical Care Nurse, 29(4), 70–73. doi: 10.4037/ccn2009969

Elkins, M. Y. (2010). Using PICO and the brief report to answer clinical questions. Nursing, 40(4), 59–60. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000369871.07714.39

Fawcett, J., & Garity, J. (2009). Chapter 6: Evaluation of middle-range theories. Evaluating Research for Evidence-Based Nursing. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: F. A. Davis.

DeSanto-Madeya, S., & Fawcett, J. (2009). Toward Understanding and Measuring Adaptation Level in the Context of the Roy Adaptation Model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 22(4), 355–359.

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I an introduction to gathering, evaluating, and recording the evidence… fifth in a series. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III the process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5

Discussion: Searching and Critiquing the Evidence

Post your responses to the Discussion based on the course requirements.

Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA guidelines as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct. Initial postings must be 250–350 words (not including references).

Help with nursing discussion

Assignment: Literature Review Matrix

This Assignment expands upon the work you have been conducting for this week’s Discussion. For this Assignment (which you will start this week, and submit by the end of Week 7), you will conduct a search for literature on your selected practice problem. A Literature Review Matrix template will be used to identify gaps in the literature.

To prepare:

• Consider the practice problem you addressed in this week’s Discussion. (You may select a new issue if necessary, but it is not recommended.)
• Review the guidelines in the Literature Review Matrix, included in the Learning Resources. Formulate a research question around your issue as indicated in Part I. Then complete Part II of the Matrix, identifying the resources you will use, search terms and criteria, and Boolean search strings.
• Using the Walden Library, locate 10 articles related to your research question. At least one article must be a systematic review. All of the articles should be primary sources. NOTE: If appropriate, you may use the four articles you reviewed for this week’s Discussion.

By Day 7 of Week 7

• Complete Part I and Part II of the Literature Review Matrix template.
• Begin working on Part III.

Systematic review assignment

Write a 290-word summary of the article in which you:

1. Provide a short summary of the review (research questions, number and type of studies reviewed, and major findings).
2. Identify if theory was used to guide the data collection and analysis.
3. Identify if the authors included theory as part of findings.
4. State the major strengths and limitations of the study utilizing the evaluation guide in Box 29.1: Guidelines for Critiquing Systematic Reviews located on p. 666 in Ch. 29 of Nursing Research.
5. Comment on the contributions of systematic reviews to evidence-based practice as contrasted with individual studies.
6. Identify the level for the study in the hierarchy of evidence located in Figure 2.1 on p. 26 in Ch. 2 of Nursing Research.
Include a reference page identifying the article you selected and format according to APA guidelines.

Chapter 11 -Describe the differences among a systematic review, an integrative review, clinical practice guidelines and a meta-analysis. Which has the most value in determining clinical practice and why?

Chapter 12 – Describe the difference between probability and non-probability sampling. Which form of sampling has the most strength why?

The reference material that should be used to answer these questions:

Title	Nursing Research
Author	Geri LoBiondo-Wood; Judith Haber

More Walden Nursing Essays;

NURS 8110 Week 1: Philosophy and Science in a Practice Discipline

NURS 8110 Week 2: Overview of Theory in Nursing

NURS 8110 Week 3: Strategies for Concept Development and Analysis

NURS 8110 Week 4: Approaches to Theory Development in Nursing

NURS 8110 Week 5: Theory Analysis and Evaluation

NURS 8110 Week 6: Systematic Reviews: Searching and Analysis of the Literature

NURS 8110 Week 7: Middle Range Theories

NURS 8110 Week 8: Interdisciplinary Theories and Models Used in Nursing, Part I

NURS 8110 Week 9: Interdisciplinary Theories and Models Used in Nursing, Part II

NURS 8110 Week 10: Application of Theory to Practice and Nursing Research

NURS 8110 Week 11: Evidence-Based Practice