Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment
Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment
Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment Walden University
NURS 6512: Advanced Health Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning Syllabus – Walden University
HELP WITH NURSING PAPER
5 quarter hours
Walden University assigns credit hours based on the number and type of assignments that
enable students to achieve the course learning objectives. In general, each semester credit
equals about 42 hours of total student work and each quarter credit equals about 28 hours of
total student work. This time requirement represents an approximate average for undergraduate
work and the minimum expectations for graduate work. The number and kind of activities
estimated to fulfill time requirements will vary by degree level and student learning style, and by
student familiarity with the delivery method and course content.
Consider the following scenarios:
- You are a nurse at a large county hospital. One of your patients is leaning toward selecting a certain radical treatment for cancer, to which the family is in opposition. The family is concerned about making the correct decision and asks for your advice.
- The state of Oregon has passed a “Death with Dignity” act that allows for euthanasia in certain situations. One of your patients suffering from terminal cancer is thinking of moving there to take advantage of this law and asks your opinion.
Throughout this course, you have explored a wide range of health assessments and abnormal examination findings. Although you have predominantly focused on the procedural aspects of health assessment, this week, you will focus on ethical considerations that should be taken into account when advising patients or their families.
This week, you will consider how evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations factor into health assessments. You will also evaluate health assessment concepts related to sports physicals and well-child and well-woman examinations.
Participate in The Ethics Behind Assessment Discussions
Ethics Behind Assessment Learning Objectives
Students will do Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment paper:
- Apply evidence-based practice guidelines to make an informed healthcare decision
- Apply ethical considerations to a health assessment response
- Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to sports physicals and well-child and well-woman examinations
- Identify concepts, theories, and principles related to advanced health assessment
Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
- Chapter 24, “Sports Participation Evaluation”In this chapter, the authors describe the process of a sports participation evaluation. The chapter also states the most common conditions encountered in a sports participation evaluation.
- Chapter 25, “Putting It All Together”In this chapter, the authors tie together the concepts introduced in previous chapters. In particular, the chapter has a strong emphasis on the patient-caregiver relationship.
Tingle, J. & Cribb, A. (2014). Nursing law and ethics (4th ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment assignment
Get expert online nursing paper help
Furman , C. D., Earnshaw, L. A., Farrer, L. A. (2014). A case of inappropriate apolipoprotein E testing in Alzheimer’s disease due to lack of an informed consent discussion. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 29(7), 590–595. doi:10.1177/1533317514525829.
Navarro-Illana, P., Aznar, J., & Díez-Domingo, J. (2014). Ethical considerations of universal vaccination against human papilloma virus. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(29). doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-29. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/15/29
Maron , B. J., Friedman, R. A., & Caplan, A. (2015). Ethics of preparticipation cardiovascular screening for athletes. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 12(6), 375–378. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.21
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2008). Recommendations for preventative pediatric health care (periodicity schedule). Retrieved from https://www.harmonyhpi.com/WCAssets/illinois/assets/IL_MedicaidProviderManual_PEM_AdultPHGsForProviders.pdf
This resource provides recommendations for preventative pediatric healthcare from infancy through adolescence. The periodicity schedule covers a variety of areas, from health history to measurements, developmental/behavioral screenings, physical exams, procedural screenings, and oral health.
Document: Final Exam Review (Word document)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)
Module 4 Introduction
Dr. Tara Harris reviews the overall expectations for Module 4. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources for your Case Study Lab Assignment and your Final exam (3m).
Sports Participation Evaluation – Week 11 (12m)
Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?
In this Ethics Behind Assessment Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.
To Prepare NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment paper:
Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.
- Based on the scenarios provided:
- Select one scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
- What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
- Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.
The Ethics Behind Assessment Lab Assignment
Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.f
By Day 6 of Week 11
Submit your NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Ethics Behind Assessment Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your NURS 6512 Week 11 Ethics Behind Assessment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 6 of Week 11
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 11 Assignment
Assignment 2: Lab Assignment: Practice Assessment: Mental Health Examination
The Lab Assignment
Complete the following in The Ethics Behind Assessment Shadow Health:
- Mental Health (Practice)
Exam: Walden University – NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment Final Exam
This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No outside resources, including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource, are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct.
This exam will be on topics covered in weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. This exam is timed with a limit of 2 hours for completion. When time is up, your exam will automatically submit.
By Day 7 of Week 11
Complete the Final Exam.
Submission and Grading Information for the NURS 6512 Week 11 The Ethics Behind Assessment
Submit Your Final Exam by Day 7 of Week 11.
To Complete this Exam:
Week 11 Exam
What’s Coming Up?
Congratulations! After you have finished all of the Ethics Behind Assessment assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. |
Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
|
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
|
Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
|
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. |
Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
|
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
|
Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
|
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view.
|
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
|
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph/Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Paragraphs/Sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
|
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
|
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Paragraphs/sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 1 (1%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
| Written Expression and Formatting
The assignment follows parenthetical/in-text citations, and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 3 evidenced based references are listed.
|
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 4 (4%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 2 evidenced based references are listed
|
Points Range: 2 (2%) – 2 (2%)
Contains parenthetical/in-text citations and at least 1 evidenced based reference is listed
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 1 (1%)
Contains no parenthetical/in-text citations and 0 evidenced based references listed.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|