Walden University – NURS 6512 Assignment: Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Walden University – NURS 6512 Assignment: Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Walden University – NURS 6512 Assignment: Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

NURS6521 Advanced Pharmacology Week 8 Assignment

For your Assignment, your Instructor will assign you one of the decision tree interactive media pieces provided in the Resources. As you examine the patient case studies in this module’s Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting symptoms of neurological and musculoskeletal disorders.

To Prepare

• Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor.
• Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
• Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.
• You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

• Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
• Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
• What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
• Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.

You will submit this Assignment in Week 8.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

ORDER A CUSTOM NURSING PAPER

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment

 

What’s Coming Up in Week 7?

Next week, you will continue working on your Assignment started in Week 6, and you will complete your Midterm Exam.

Week 6: Neurologic and Musculoskeletal Disorders and Opioids

Sabrina is a 26 year old female who has just been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. She has scheduled an appointment for a follow up with her physician but has several questions about her diagnosis and is calling the Nurse Helpline for her hospital network. As she talks with the advanced practice nurse, she learns that her diagnosis also impacts her neurologic and musculoskeletal systems. Although multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disorder, both the neurologic and musculoskeletal systems will be affected by adverse symptoms that Sabrina needs to be aware of and for which specific drug therapy plans and other treatment options need to be decided on.

As an advanced practice nurse, what types of drugs will best address potential neurologic and musculoskeletal symptoms Sabrina might experience?

This week, you will evaluate patients for the treatment of neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders by focusing on specific patient case studies through a decision tree exercise. You will analyze the decisions you will make in the decision tree exercise and reflect on your experiences in proposing the recommended actions to address the health needs in the patient case study.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Evaluate patients for treatment of neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders
• Analyze decisions made throughout the diagnosis and treatment of patients with neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders
• Justify decisions made throughout the diagnosis and treatment of patients with neurologic and musculoskeletal disorders

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : NURS 6512 Assignment: Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2^nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

• Chapter 11, “Basic Principles of Neuropharmacology” (pp. 67–71)
• Chapter 12, “Physiology of the Peripheral Nervous System” (pp. 72–81)
• Chapter 12, “Muscarinic Agonists and Cholinesterase Inhibitors” (pp. 82–89)
• Chapter 14, “Muscarinic Antagonists” (pp. 90-98)
• Chapter 15, “Adrenergic Agonists” (pp. 99–107)
• Chapter 16, “Adrenergic Antagonists” (pp. 108–119)
• Chapter 17, “Indirect-Acting Antiadrenergic Agents” (pp. 120–124)
• Chapter 18, “Introduction to Central Nervous System Pharmacology” (pp. 125–126)
• Chapter 19, “Drugs for Parkinson Disease” (pp. 127–142)
• Chapter 20, “Drugs for Alzheimer Disease” (pp. 159–166)
• Chapter 21, “Drugs for Seizure Disorders” (pp. 150–170)
• Chapter 22, “Drugs for Muscle Spasm and Spasticity” (pp. 171–178)
• Chapter 24, “Opioid Analgesics, Opioid Antagonists, and Nonopioid Centrally Acting Analgesics” (pp. 183–194)
• Chapter 59, “Drug Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis” (pp. 513–527)
• Chapter 60, “Drug Therapy of Gout” (pp. 528–536)
• Chapter 61, “Drugs Affecting Calcium Levels and Bone Mineralization” (pp. 537–556)

American Academy of Family Physicians. (2019). Dementia. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/topicModules/viewTopicModule.htm?topicModuleId=5

This website provides information relating to the diagnosis, treatment, and patient education of dementia. It also presents information on complications and special cases of dementia.

Linn, B. S., Mahvan, T., Smith, B. E. Y., Oung, A. B., Aschenbrenner, H., & Berg, J. M. (2020). Tips and tools for safe opioid prescribing: This review–with tables summarizing opioid options, dosing considerations, and recommendations for tapering–will help you provide rigorous Tx for noncancer pain while ensuring patient safety. Journal of Family Practice, 69(6), 280–292.

Disorders of The Nervous System

Reflect on the comprehensive review of disorders of the nervous system and think about how you might recommend or prescribe pharmacotherapeutics to treat these disorders. (15m)

Speed Pharmacology. (2019). Drugs for Parkinson’s Disease (Made Easy) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z84iypHdftQ&t=13s
Note: This media program is approximately 9 minutes.

Speed Pharmacology. (2019). Pharmacology- Drugs for Alzheimer’s Disease (Made Easy) [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euzRPrvrwj0&t=31s
Note: This media program is approximately 7 minutes.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

NURS 6512 Week8 Assignment: Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders Rubric

		Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific.		Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.	Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.	Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented, or is missing.
Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.		Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.	Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.	Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature, or is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.
What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.		Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided.	Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate.	Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned, or is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing.
Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.		Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. The response provides specific, accurate, and relevant examples that fully support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.	Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. The response provides accurate examples that support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.	Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise. The response provides inaccurate or vague examples that may or may not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) vaguely explains in detail any differences between what they expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decisions in the exercise, or is missing. The response provides inaccurate and vague examples that do not support whether there were differences between the decisions made and the decisions available in the exercise, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.		Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.	Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation		Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors	Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.		Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors	Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors	Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3–4) APA format errors	Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
Total Points: 100