Walden – NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
Walden – NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
|
Need for Psychological Assistance to Healthcare Professionals who deal with COVID 19 Patients.
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
Get Assistance With Your Nursing Assignment
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
|
Alikhani, R., Salimi, A., Hormati, A., & Aminnejad, R. (2020). Mental health advice for frontline healthcare providers caring for patients with COVID-19. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 67(8), 1068-1069.
|
Billings, J., Abou Seif, N., Hegarty, S., Ondruskova, T., Soulios, E., Bloomfield, M., & Greene, T. (2021). What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(9), e0256454.
|
Chersich, M. F., Gray, G., Fairlie, L., Eichbaum, Q., Mayhew, S., Allwood, B., … & Rees, H. (2020). COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers. Globalization and health, 16, 1-6.
|
Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Joshi, A. D., Guo, C. G., Ma, W., Mehta, R. S., … & COPE Consortium. (2020). Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers. MedRxiv.
|
|
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) |
The healthcare teams have always been at the frontline of the battle against the coronavirus pandemic since it was reported as a global concern. The emphasis of standardized criteria has been on keeping these teams safe from infections and bodily injury. There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health. Operating under duress in a high-stress job is exhausting even when things are going well. I choose to review this article because patients and their healthcare professionals will benefit from interventions that reduce tiredness, burnout, especially medical errors. All healthcare personnel must collaborate for a better change. |
I chose to incorporate this article since the importance of assisting frontline workers’ mental health has recently been recognized within the article. Unfortunately, there has been little study on effectively serving frontline professionals’ psychosocial needs—neither one according to their own experiences and perspectives on what may be most appropriate.
|
I chose to utilize this source because, while the medical personnel care for their COVID-19 patients, they experience emotional and physical fatigue, isolation from their families, stigma, and the grief of losing patients or their coworkers. The virus has infected many of them, and several have died as a result. There are severe deficiencies in response capability in Africa, where the disease is spreading, particularly human resources and personal protective gear.
Due to global competition, Africa’s supply of protective gear is restricted (Chersich et al., 2020). Low-cost treatments like facemasks for coughing patients and proper handwashing equipment, as well as ‘physical distance’ in packed public healthcare facilities, might be difficult. COVID-19 deaths among healthcare workers in Africa can be significant if sufficient protection is not provided due to a lack of critical care units and problems transferring ill healthcare practitioners from villages to city treatment centers.
|
Over 40 million occurrences of COVID-19 have already been recorded worldwide as of 2020, with nearly 270,000 fatalities (Nguyen et al., 2020). The prevalence of this illness was anticipated to grow within the initial weeks due to continuous community infection from asymptomatic persons. The constant use of prescribed PPE is important to minimizing infection based on experience with other infections transmitted by respiratory secretions.
|
| Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article | According to Alikhani et al. (2020), research under this topic would establish countrywide psychological support hotlines to aid healthcare practitioners during the pandemic. Evidence-based assessments and mental health therapies aimed at frontline medical practitioners, on the other hand, are in short supply (Alikhani et al., 2020). The goal of this research was to examine psychological wellbeing across health care professionals treating COVID-19 victims by assessing the severity of depression, anxiety, sleeplessness, and discomfort symptoms and identifying possible risk factors linked with some of these symptoms. | The sole goal of this research was to research the most effective intervention for health care workers (Billings et al., 2021). They set out to fill this study gap by systematically investigating the experiences and perspectives of UK frontline social and health care professionals on psychological assistance throughout the epidemic. | In an epidemic, African healthcare professional confront significant obstacles, and this was the main research aim. Chersich et al. (2020) offer ten high-priority actions in Africa to protect frontline health professionals. The epidemic in Africa, and its long-term effects on social security, economic prosperity, and safety, will be shaped by how successfully we preserve their physical and mental health as there are several objectives for the COVID-19 action on the region, Chersich et al. (2020) strongly encourage WHO, federal governments, the corporate sector, and also the general public to focus on health – care workers protection and psychological wellbeing.
|
Since data regarding frontline health professionals and risk of covid 19 infections are sparse and whether protective equipment lessens this hazard is uncertain. Nguyen et al. (2020) looked at the danger of COVID-19 among active Healthcare staff versus the general public and the impact of personal protective equipment. Healthcare practitioners on the front lines exhibited a considerably higher risk of infection. The risk was greatest among those who reused their gear or had insufficient access to protective protection equipment. Appropriate protective equipment supplies, on the other hand, did not entirely prevent high-risk exposures. |
| Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. |
This study utilized a qualitative research method of data collection. Alikhani et al. (2020) seem to be more interested in qualitative research’s validity, applicability, and dependability than consistency. They engaged several researchers in the data collecting, coding, and analysis procedures to enhance the validity of their findings by questioning their preconceptions and uncovering potential ‘weak points’ that they could have had with relation to this issue. First, before the trial began, the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University’s clinical research and ethics committee gave its approval. Before being enrolled in the survey, every participant gave verbally informed permission. |
The research employed the mixed method of data collection under its methodology. Frontline social and health care employees were purposefully recruited using social platforms and non – random sampling among healthcare colleagues. Participants who agreed to participate in the research were interviewed using a semi-structured interview protocol over the phone (Billings et al., 2021). The study team used the techniques of Reflexive Thematic Analysis to analyze the interview transcripts. | Here, a qualitative approach of data collection method was utilized. Studies were selected to provide data and analysis on the dangers of infection and psychological health that healthcare professionals experienced during the pandemic. Research also took place in a variety of settings (Chersich et al., 2020). Publications about the COVID-19 epidemic in Africa, in general, were also incorporated. Publications on infection prevention and control or psychological health in the pandemic were equally essential; therefore, they were included in this study. | Here, to conduct this research, quantitative research methods were used. This large prospective study was also conducted through using COVID 19 Symptom Research software, a smartphone app developed by Zoe Global Company limited in partnership with Massachusetts General Hospital as well as King’s College in London that provides participants with a directed interface to reveal a variety of benchmark demographic and comorbidity information, along with everyday information on prospective symptoms. |
| A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. |
The strength of the qualitative research methodology employed has many implications. This qualitative research included reflexivity, which allows readers to assess the validity of the findings by learning more about the research team that created them (Alikhani et al., 2020). This team is comprised of a varied collection of researchers from various career phases, clinical specialties, genders, and a variety of backgrounds. Therefore, the ethical standards in the research methodology were upheld to the latter.
|
According to the findings of this research, frontline social and health care professionals are likely to require a flexible social support system that includes peer, organizational, and professional assistance. Therefore, this demonstrates that the research methodology was adhered to and the most appropriate data was collected. More study is needed to completely understand the structural, institutional, and individual obstacles to receiving psychological help (Billings et al., 2021). It is necessary to increase collaboration, engagement, and co-production of support programs and their assessment.
|
One of the important strengths of the research methodology in this article is that appropriate measures inside health institutions can reduce the risk of infection among healthcare workers. This mostly entails using safety equipment, such as gowns, gloves, masks, and eyewear. Careful wearing and personal protective equipment are still crucial defenses, but they need extensive training and supervision.
|
The app was released in the United Kingdom in March 2020 and then in the United States in March 2020 (Nguyen et al., 2020). Participants were found through social media network outreach and invite to study volunteers from the researchers of long-running prospective studies. Participants gave informed permission to use aggregated data for research purposes and approved the privacy policy and use requirements at the time of enrolment (Nguyen et al., 2020). The London Ethics Committee approved this observational study.
|
| General Notes/Comments | There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health. | In this article, the COVID-19 virus has had a major impact on frontline social and health care professionals’ psychological health and overall wellbeing. | Authors in this article encountered these issues and made recommendations on how to protect health professionals from emotional and physical fatigue, isolation from their families, stigma, and the grief of losing patients or their coworkers. | Because there is limited data on frontline health personnel and COVID 19 infections, it is unclear if protective equipment can reduce the risk. |
24/7 Nursing Homework Help
Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!
