NUR 601 Week 4 Assignment 1: Grand Theory Group Presentation

oWorked as a curriculum consultant for a variety of collegiate institution’s such as The University of Alberta, George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology, The University of Southern Mississippi, Georgetown University, Incarnate Word College, El Paso Community College, The Medical College of Virginia, and The Washington Technical Institute. oAlso worked as a curriculum consultant for The Office of Education, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Practical Nurse Section in 1958, 1959, and 1960, to the Division of Hospital and Institutional Services, The Indiana State Board of Health from 1949 to 1957, and to the Center for Experimentation and Development in Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1969-1971, and as the Director of Nursing, Wilmer Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1975-1976.

oIn 1971 Orem published Nursing: Concepts of Practice, the work in which she outlines her theory of nursing, the Self-care Deficit Theory of Nursing.

oThe International Orem Society was founded to foster research and the continued development of Orem’s theories of nursing.

She was inducted into the American Academy of Nursing and received awards from the National League for Nursing and the Sigma Theta Tau Nursing Honor Society

Value: 100

Due: Day 1

Gradebook Category: Grand Theory Group Presentation

Looking for nursing papers writing help? Top Nursing Papers Writing Service Online is here. A team of professional nursing essay writers ready to help. Relieve academic stress! With you all through your education course. There is no nursing subject we cannot handle.

Instructions

Select one member of your group to post your Grand Theory Group Presentation website/URL.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

To Submit Your Assignment:

Select the Add Submissions button.
Drag or upload your file to the File Picker.
Select Save Changes.

Submission status

Group	Group A

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : NUR 601 Week 4 Assignment 1: Grand Theory Group Presentation

Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your

textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Make sure to review the assignment instructions for any required components that are not listed within the rubric.

Visual Learning Presentation – 100 Points
Criteria	Exemplary Exceeds Expectations	Advanced Meets Expectations	Intermediate Needs Improvement	Novice Inadequate	Total Points
Content and Focus	In addition to meeting the expectations, clear examples supported by course content and references articulate the relationship to the focus of the assignment along with the implications to the role of an APRN and the profession of nursing. Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials. All instruction requirements noted. 40 points	Components of the visual assignment are topic focused and accurately and thoroughly presented via use of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role content. Cites two references. All instruction requirements noted. 35 points	Components are mostly accurate and/or ideas may be overstated with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content. 31 points	Components do not relate to the topic of the assignment but an attempt was made to articulate a relationship, or there is no attempt to explain how the content relates to the topic or why the sources were chosen. Absent application of evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation. No references cited. Submission is late. 27 points	40
Use of Critical Thinking to Analyze, Synthesize, and Apply Knowledge	Beyond meeting the expectations, the student offers a clear analysis and synthesis of content with application of knowledge through robust use of scholarly citations with critical analysis of the content and the relationship to the profession of nursing. The knowledge gained from this assignment is synthesized to indicate a plausible path for utilization within practice as an APRN. All instruction requirements noted. 40 points	The assignment submission is complete, providing evidence of synthesis of both assignment instructions and course content via application and demonstration of knowledge based on providing correct answers to all posed questions and use of scholarly resources. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support required concepts by applying content for use in professional practice as an APRN. All instruction requirements noted. 35 points	Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content without adding information or insight. Application of knowledge is limited, demonstrated by an incorrect answer to questions posed with limited analysis or synthesis of scholarly resources. Self-reflection is limited by only alluding to a practice application. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and or development. 31 points	Submission is primarily a summation of assignment with no further synthesis of course content or analysis of the scenario. The assignment does not demonstrate critical evaluations of content and/or connection to sources, course content, or assignment instructions. Application of knowledge is insufficient due to two or more incorrect answers to questions posed. The student did not note an application to personal practice. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and or inadequate preparation. Submission is late. 27 points	40
Formatting of Content and Voiceover (If Applicable)	Content is presented in a visually appealing manner and within the assigned length. Voiceover (if applicable) provides a verbal narrative that has clear intonation, appropriate pace of speech, and interesting inflection and animation that easily grabs the viewers’ attention. All instruction requirements noted. 5 points	Presentation is clean, with minimal, if any, overuse of text. Submission length is as assigned. Voiceover (if applicable) provides a verbal narrative that has clear intonation, appropriate pace of speech, and interesting inflection and animation. All instruction requirements noted. 4 points	There is overuse of text. Submission length is incorrect (i.e., +/- one slide). Voiceover (if applicable) provides a verbal narrative that has intonation, pace, or inflection issues that are distracting and/or make the presentation unclear at times. 3 points	There is a significant overuse of text causing distractions and difficulty understanding the presentation. Voiceover (if applicable) is difficult to understand and/or follow. Submission demonstrates inadequate preparation. Submission is late. 2 points	5
Organization	Well-organized, visually appealing content with an obvious purpose for the presentation. Creativity, use of technology, and seamless flow of the presentation material is noted. All instruction requirements noted. 5 points	Presentation is clean, with minimal, if any, overuse of text. Organized content and purpose can be found within the presentation. Argument content is developed with minimal issues in content flow. If applicable, presentation notes are focused and allow for a seamless review of content. Applicable medium (e.g., slide theme, transitions, and fonts, etc.) are professional and consistent. All instruction requirements noted. 4 points	There is overuse of text. Poor organization and or limited use of applicable technology interrupt the flow of ideas and distract from content. Purpose is vague or not reflective of assignment. One instruction requirement is vague or missing. 3 points	Frequent illogical flow of ideas with unfocused, unorganized, and missing significant content. Purpose is missing. Prose rambles. Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation Submission is late. 2 points	5
APA Referencing	Correct and consistent APA formatting of citations as applicable. With no APA errors. 5 points	Correct and consistent APA formatting of citations as applicable. No more than two unique APA errors. 4 points	Multiple applicable APA errors. 3 points	More than five individual APA applicable type errors, or no attempt to format in applicable APA. Submission is late. 2 points	5
Grammar and Spelling	The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language. Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions. There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 5 points	The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. There are minimal or no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 4 points	The writer occasionally uses awkward wording and demonstrates a limited understanding of formal written language use but makes an attempt to convey the correct meaning. Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors. 3 points	The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous. Submission is late. 2 points	5
Total Points					100

NUR 601 Week 4 Assignment 1: Grand Theory Group Presentation