NRNP 6635 Week 3: Foundations of Group Work and Types of Therapy
Order for NRNP 6635 Week 3: Foundations of Group Work and Types of Therapy essay assignment help.
NRNP 6635 Week 3: Foundations of Group Work and Types of Therapy
NRNP 6635 Assignment: Analyzing Group Techniques
And as participants improve, the group as a whole benefit. Members can be agents of change for each other. Seeing others’ progress can help group members realize they, too, can cope and feel better.
—Dr. Nina W. Brown, “Power in Numbers”
Group therapy can be very beneficial for clients. In fact, research has shown that for many clients, group therapy is as effective as individual therapy. Members of groups are not only able to influence change within one another, but they are often able to more easily relate to the guidance of peers than that of a therapist. With the increasing popularity of this therapeutic approach, it is essential for you to have a strong foundation in psychotherapeutic techniques for groups.
This week, you explore group therapy and consider how you might apply current literature to your own clinical practice.
Learning Objectives
Students will: Get NRNP 6635 Week 3: Foundations of Group Work and Types of Therapy Essay Assignment Help
- Evaluate the efficacy of group therapy techniques in counseling sessions
- Recommend strategies for leading group therapy sessions
Learning Resources: As provided.
Assignment: Analyzing Group Techniques
Group therapy can alleviate feelings of isolation and foster a supportive and collaborative environment for sharing difficult feelings in order to facilitate healing. For many people, being part of a group that has a shared understanding of a struggle provides a unique opportunity to gain an understanding of their own experiences.
As you examine one of the group therapy demonstrations from this week’s Learning Resources, consider the role and efficacy of the leader and the reasons that specific therapeutic techniques were selected.
To prepare:
- Select one of the group therapy video demonstrations from this week’s required media Learning Resources.
The Assignment:
In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:
- What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
- What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
- What did you notice that the therapist did well?
- Explain something that you would have handled differently.
- What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
- Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
- Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
By Day 7
Submit NRNP 6635 Week 3: Foundations of Group Work and Types of Therapy Assignment.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment Rubric
In Module 2, you will explore theoretical approaches to psychotherapy, including psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral therapy, supportive and interpersonal psychotherapy, and humanistic-existential therapy. Next week in Week 4, you will engage with resources on psychodynamic theory, but there will be no assignment submission required. This will allow you to focus on your Week 4 practicum case presentation if you are taking these two courses concurrently.
Next Module
Name: NRNP 6645 Week3 Foundations of Group Work and Types of Therapy Assignment Rubric
| Excellent
90%–100% |
Good
80%–89% |
Fair
70%–79% |
Poor
0%–69% |
|||
| Develop a 3- to 4-page paper considering the role and efficacy of the leader of a group therapy demonstration. Be sure to address the following: · Describe the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated and evaluate how well they were demonstrated. . Include evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques. | 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately describes and evaluates the efficacy of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video. The response includes evidence from the literature that supports the use of the demonstrated techniques. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video. The response includes somewhat vague or inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The description and evaluation of the group therapy techniques that were demonstrated in the video are vague and inaccurate, or missing. The response includes vague and inaccurate evidence from the literature to support the use of the demonstrated techniques, or is missing. |
||
| · Identify what the therapist did well. · Explain something that you would have handled differently. · Identify an insight that you gained form watching the therapist handle the group therapy. | 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail what the therapist did well. The response accurately and thoroughly explains something that could have been handled differently. The response accurately and thoroughly explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately explains in detail what the therapist did well. The response accurately explains something that could have been handled differently. The response accurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains in detail what the therapist did well, or is missing. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains something that could have been handled differently, or is missing. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains an insight gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy, or is missing. |
||
| Imagine that you are leading your own group session. · Describe how would you go about handling a difficult group member. · Explain how you would elicit participation in your group. · Describe what you would anticipate to find in different phases of the group therapy. · Explain the benefits and challenges of group therapy. | 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response includes a detailed and accurate description of how to handle a difficult group member. The response accurately and thoroughly explains how to elicit participation in group therapy. The response thoroughly and accurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy. The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation the benefits and challenges of group therapy. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response includes a description of how to handle a difficult group member. The response explains how to elicit participation in group therapy. The response describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy. The response explains the benefits and challenges of group therapy. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains how to elicit participation in group therapy. The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy. The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explaination of the benefits and challenges of group therapy. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate description of how to handle a difficult group member, or is missing. The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how to elicit participation in group therapy, or is missing. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes anticipated findings in different phases of group therapy, or is missing. The response includes a vague or inaccurate explaination the benefits and challenges of group therapy, or is missing. |
||
| • Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. | 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected provide strong justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Two peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources are used to support the assignment. Resources selected provide appropriate justification for reasoning and represent the latest in standards of care. Or, three scholarly resources are used to support the assignment, but provide only weak support for reasoning or do not represent the latest in standards of care. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Resources selected are not peer reviewed and evidence based, or provide poor justification for reasoning. Or, resources are missing. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 APA format errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||