NR 510 Week 6:APN Professional Development Plan Paper Assignment

APN Professional Development Plan Paper Rubric

NR510 APN Professional Development Plan Grading Rubric
NR510 APN Professional Development Plan Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Introduction to the APN professional development plan

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Excellent introduction of APN professional development plan. Rationale is well presented and purpose fully developed.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- Good introduction of APN professional development plan. Rationale is presented and purpose provided.

16.0 pts

Meets- Basic information and/or limited elements addressed regarding APN professional development plan and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Little or very general introduction of APN professional development plan. Little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area.

0.0 pts

Developing- No introduction of APN professional development plan provided.
20.0 pts

APN Scope of Practice

35.0 pts

Exceptional- Provided detailed information regarding education, licensure, and regulatory requirements, as well as practice environment details per the student’s state. Included information regarding full, limited, or restricted practice limitations as well as prescriptive authority.

31.0 pts

Exceeds- Provided some information regarding education, licensure, and regulatory requirements, as well as practice environment details per the student’s state. Included information regarding full, limited, or restricted practice limitations as well as prescriptive authority.

28.0 pts

Meets- Provided non-state specific information regarding education, licensure, and regulatory requirements, as well as practice environment details. Included information regarding full, limited, or restricted practice limitations as well as prescriptive authority.

13.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Lacking detailed information regarding education, licensure, regulatory requirements, or practice environment. Missing information regarding practice limitations and/or prescriptive authority.

0.0 pts

Developing- Did not provide information regarding education, licensure, and regulatory requirements, as well as practice environment details per the student’s state. Not provide information regarding full, limited, or restricted practice limitations as well as prescriptive authority.
35.0 pts

Personal Assessment

25.0 pts

Exceptional- Provided detailed information following a personal assessment and reflected upon strengths, weaknesses, goals, and objectives.

22.0 pts

Exceeds- Provided some detailed information following a personal assessment and reflected upon some of the strengths, weaknesses, goals, and objectives.

20.0 pts

Meets- Provided some detailed information following a personal assessment. Missed providing reflection upon strengths, weaknesses, goals, or objectives.

10.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Provided information following a personal assessment, but did not reflect upon strengths, weaknesses, goals, or objectives.

0.0 pts

Developing- Did not provide a personal assessment and did not reflect upon personal strengths, weaknesses, goals, or objectives.
25.0 pts

Networking and Marketing Strategies

25.0 pts

Exceptional- Provided detailed information regarding local and national professional organizations that advertise employment opportunities for APNs. Identified networking and marketing strategies and provide a rationale for their selections.

22.0 pts

Exceeds- Provided some detailed information regarding local and national professional organizations that advertise employment opportunities for APNs. Identified networking and marketing strategies and provide a rationale for their selections.

20.0 pts

Meets- Provided information but lacked specific details regarding local and national professional organizations that advertise employment opportunities for APNs. Identified networking and marketing strategies and provide a rationale for their selections.

10.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Provided information regarding professional organizations that advertise employment opportunities, but missed providing information regarding networking and marketing strategies and/or a rationale for their selections.

0.0 pts

Developing- Did not provide detailed information regarding local and national professional organizations that advertise employment opportunities for APNs. Did not identify networking and marketing strategies or provide a rationale.
25.0 pts

Curriculum Vitae

35.0 pts

Exceptional- Provided detailed information which included demographics, education, professional employment, licensure and certification, professional honors, research, scholarship, and service. Free from typographical errors.

31.0 pts

Exceeds- Provided detailed information. Missing 1-2 key elements. Free from typographical errors.

28.0 pts

Meets- Provided moderately detailed information. Missing 3 key elements. Free from typographical errors.

13.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Provided minimal detail. Missing 4 or more key elements. Contains 1-2 typographical errors.

0.0 pts

Developing- Information provided was inaccurate and vague. Contains 3 or more typographical errors. Did not provide curriculum vitae.
35.0 pts

Conclusion

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Excellent summary of APN professional development plan. Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- Good summary of APN professional development plan. Conclusions are supported by evidence and developed.

16.0 pts

Meets- Basic and/or limited summary regarding APN professional development plan.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Little or no summary of APN professional development plan; inappropriate emphasis on an area.

0.0 pts

Developing- No summary of APN professional development plan and/or conclusions were provided.
20.0 pts

Clarity of Writing

20.0 pts

Exceptional- Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- Good use of standard English showing original thought. No more than two spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

16.0 pts

Meets- Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

0.0 pts

Developing- More than six spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.
20.0 pts

APA Format

20.0 pts

Exceptional- APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

18.0 pts

Exceeds- Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

16.0 pts

Meets- Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

0.0 pts

Developing- Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
20.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0