N 510 Module 3 Assignment Create a table differentiating the types of anemia, their clinical presentations, causes, and diagnostic tests

N 510 Module 3 Assignment Create a table differentiating the types of anemia, their clinical presentations, causes, and diagnostic tests

N 510 Module 3 Assignment Create a table differentiating the types of anemia, their clinical presentations, causes, and diagnostic tests

N 510 Advanced Pathophysiology

Module 3 Assignment

Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append.

Start by reading and following these instructions:

1. Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.

2. Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

3. Consider the discussions and the any insights gained from it.

4. Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Assignment:

Create a presentation addressing all of the following topics:

Create a table differentiating the types of anemia, their clinical presentations, causes, and diagnostic tests

What compensatory measures does the body employ in an attempt to restore cardiac output? What are the effect of these compensatory measures?

Discuss the difference between right-sided and left-sided HF, their causes, clinical presentations, and diagnostic tests.

How do the clinical presentations, prognosis, and management of acute and chronic leukemia differ?

This PowerPoint® (Microsoft Office) or Impress® (Open Office) presentation should be a minimum of 20 slides (maximum of 30 slides), including a title, introduction, conclusion and reference slide, with detailed speaker notes and recorded audio comments for all content slides. Use the audio recording feature with the presentation software. Use at least four scholarly sources and make certain to review the module’s Signature Assignment Rubric before starting your presentation

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with N 510 Module 3 Assignment Create a table differentiating the types of anemia, their clinical presentations, causes, and diagnostic tests

Criteria	Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance	Exceeds Very good or high level of performance	Meets Satisfactory level of performance	Needs Improvements Poor or failing  level of performance	Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
Total Points Possible= 100
	30 Points	26 Points	24 Points	11 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge	Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, and are applicable to the discussion/case presentation.	Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the discussion/case presentation.	Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but some responses have limited perspectives and insights, and have limited application to discussion/case presentation, or only two of the three posts have been fully answered.	Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but posts are not consistent with current practice, or only one post has been fully answered.	Student does not fully answer discussion questions in all of the parts, or responses offer neither insight, nor application to discussion/case presentation.
	30 Points	26 Points	24 Points	11 Points	0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)	All three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.	All three discussion posts are from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided. However, evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articles that are cited may not fully support the discussion in any one area.	Two of the three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.	Only one of the discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) scholarly in nature, 2) published within the last 5 years, and; 3) in-text citations and full references are provided.	Discussion posts One, Two, and Three contain No evidence- based practice references or citations. *Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week.
	10 Points	9 Points	8 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Organization	Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence.	Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings which are sometimes unclear to follow.	Discussion posts present case findings in a logical and understandable method but One of the discussion parts contain a significant error.	Discussion posts are sometimes unclear to follow and/or there are significant errors in Two discussion parts.	Discussion posts are Not presented in a logical, understandable sequence and/or there are significant errors in ALL THREE discussion parts.
	26 Points	23 Points	21 Points	10 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue	Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three. A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.	Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources. Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three. A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.	Responds to a student peer and/or faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion. Does include evidence from appropriate sources	Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantial. Does not include evidence from any resources.	Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions by Sunday.
	4 Points	3 Points	2 Points	1 Point	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA	APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.	Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.	Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.	Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.	Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
	0 Points Deducted	10% deduction per day for late discussion post			33 points deducted per omitted/late discussion part
Participation Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.	Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.	Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post. *See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document in Course Resources			Written submissions will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due. 33 points deducted per part if Part 1 is not posted by Friday 11:59 p.m., Part 2 or 3 is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.
* Refer to “What is a Scholarly Source” and “Reference Guide for FNP Case Studies” in the “Course Resources” section ** Part Three discussion CLOSES at Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT-deductions will apply once discussion has closed.