Walden University MMHA 6050 Week6 Assignment Ethics in Healthcare

Get Ethics in Healthcare Paper Help

Summarize the original continuum of care plan submitted in Week 3, as well as the healthcare settings that you identified.
Summarize the feedback that was provided to you for each week from your colleagues.
Incorporating your peer-review feedback, propose at least one improvement for each of the following value-based care elements and IOM Aims.
- Week 4: Organize care around medical conditions
- Week 4: Be patient-centered
- Week 5: Measure outcomes and cost for every patient
- Week 5: Be effective
- Week 6: Aligning reimbursement with value
- Week 6: Be safe
Compare your community’s model of healthcare delivery to the delivery model of other countries that closely align with the following value-based care elements, including an explanation of what lessons—positive or negative—your community could learn from the other countries:
- Week 4: Organize care around medical conditions
- Week 5: Measure outcomes and cost for every patient
- Week 6: Aligning reimbursement with value
Provide a summary and conclusion for your paper.

Walden University MMHA_6050_Week6_Assignment_Rubric

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeElement 1: Improvements Based on Established Models

42 to >38.0 pts

Approximately 100% to >90%

Student evaluates a continuum of care scenario based on established models, to include a thorough and detailed proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the elements of the value-based care model (“organize care around medical conditions,” “measure outcomes and cost for every patient,” and “aligning reimbursement with value”) and proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the IOM Aims (“be patient-centered,” “be effective,” and “be safe”). They demonstrate depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking and include multiple relevant examples and evidence from the readings and/or other scholarly sources.

38 to >33.5 pts

Approximately 90% to >80%

Student evaluates a continuum of care scenario based on established models, to include a moderately detailed proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the elements of the value-based care model (“organize care around medical conditions,” “measure outcomes and cost for every patient,” and “aligning reimbursement with value”) and proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the IOM Aims (“be patient-centered,” “be effective,” and “be safe”). They mostly demonstrate depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking and include at least one pertinent example and evidence from the readings and/or other scholarly sources.

33.5 to >29.5 pts

Approximately 80% to >70%

Student evaluates a continuum of care scenario based on established models, to include a marginally detailed proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the elements of the value-based care model (“organize care around medical conditions,” “measure outcomes and cost for every patient,” and “aligning reimbursement with value”) and proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the IOM Aims (“be patient-centered,” “be effective,” and “be safe”). They demonstrate minimal depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking. They may be lacking or incorrect in some areas, details, and/or specificity. They may not include sufficient pertinent examples or evidence from sources.

29.5 to >0 pts

Approximately 70% to >0%

Student demonstrates little to no evidence of evaluating a continuum of care scenario based on established models and/or includes a cursory or incomplete proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the elements of the value-based care model (“organize care around medical conditions,” “measure outcomes and cost for every patient,” and “aligning reimbursement with value”) and proposal of at least one improvement that could be made based on three of the IOM Aims (“be patient-centered,” “be effective,” and “be safe”). They demonstrate a lack of depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking and may not include pertinent examples or evidence from sources.

42 pts

24/7 Nursing Homework Help

Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!

Walden University MMHA 6050 Week6 Assignment Ethics in Healthcare