HP 609 Week 8 Discussion 1: Oral Testimony
HP 609 Week 8 Discussion 1: Oral Testimony
Due: by Day 7. Replies are not required. Posting your video to this discussion board forum will enable your classmates to watch your oral testimony if they want to.
Initial Post
For this assignment, you will complete a video of your testimony. Do not read your testimony. Here are some sources that will help you understand the public hearing and legislative process:
- Video—Tips on Testifying Before a Legislative Committee
- Video—Example of Oral Testimony Mass. Gov. Baker on Comprehensive Health Care Legislation
- Governor Baker, Secretary Sudders Testify on Administration’s Comprehensive Health Care Legislation Video Transcript
- Video—Example of Oral Testimony at Vermont Public Hearing
- Joint Legislative Committee Hearing on Health Care Part 1 Video Transcript
- Video—Example of Testimony and Public Hearing—US Senate Hearing on Health Care Costs
- Videos and Testimony—Pathways to Universal Coverage
- Example 1 of Written Testimony (Word)
- Example 2 of Written Testimony (Word)
To create your video:
- Your video should be 2.5 to 3 minutes in length.
- Use the Zoom Tutorial to create your video using Zoom. Refer to the Making a Video in Zoom (Word) document for more information.
- When your video is complete, use the YouTube instructions to create an unlisted video URL.
- Post the YouTube video URL to this discussion.
- Remember, this is a discussion board, so everyone will be able to see your assignment.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
Posting to the Discussion Forum
- Select the appropriate Thread.
- Select Reply.
- Create your post.
- Select Post to Forum.
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : HP 609 Week 8 Discussion 1: Oral Testimony
Get assistance with nursing paper
Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range (example: 25–20 points, 20–15 points, 15–10 points, 10–0 points).
Criteria | Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement | Inadequate | Total Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality of Initial Post | Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).
All components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points |
Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).
Most components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is applied but limited. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points |
Initial post is one day late.
Does not meet the correct length (500–750 words). Some components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is weak or missing. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points |
Initial post is more than one day late.
Initial post much fewer than (500–750 words). Few components of the initial post requirements are addressed. Course content synthesis is missing. References are not included. 10 points |
25 |
Peer Replies | On time.
There was substantial evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions and new information. Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 25 points |
On time. There was some evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are 200–400 words. References are included according to the Discussion instructions. 20 points |
There was either some synthesis of course content or the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are less than 200 words. References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions. 15 points |
There was little or no evidence of course content utilizing course topics or the introduction of questions or new information.
Replies are less than 200 words References are not included. 10 points |
25 |
Frequency of Contribution | Initial post with two peer replies posted on two separate days.
25 points |
Initial post with two peer replies posted on the same day.
20 points |
Initial post with one peer reply.
15 points |
Only initial post submitted or only replied to peers.
10 points |
25 |
Organization, Writing Mechanics, and APA Format | Clearly organized, no or limited writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
25 points |
Clearly organized, few to some writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
20 points |
Poorly organized, several to moderate writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
15 points |
Poorly organized, many writing mechanics and/or APA errors.
10 points |
25 |
Total points | 100 |