Health & Medicine Questionnaire

1. Person who uses many or all of the learning styles is said to be:

mullti-talented.

multi-styled.

multi-modal.

multi-learning.

2. intelligence is measured by:

an IQ test.

an EIQ test.

multiple intelligence tests.

multiple ways.

3. Which do you think is the most proven way people, in general, learn?

What we read

What we see

What we hear

What we do and experience

4. To become a successful online learner is to:

be technically and computer savvy.

be a good communicator and writer.

be committed.

learn and apply what it takes to be one.

Health & Medicine Questionnaire

What would you say is the most unusual/obscure term in your subject area?

The most usual and obscure or difficult term could be rate, which in science, medicine, and other professions is used with rather different meanings and in different contexts. It is a good example of a polysemic term. The current edition of the dictionary offers more than 60 definitions of rate and related terms (e.g. attributable rate, infection rate, and hazard rate). Some of such definitions have changed not only in the past 30 years, but in several of the six editions of the dictionary since 1983.

Request “Write My Nursing Essay” for a 100% custom writing tailored to your instructions: Health & Medicine Questionnaire

<

 

 

What do you believe is the most common misunderstanding in your field?

Perhaps epidemiology exclusively investigates disease epidemics, despite the fact that it has long been demonstrated (and acknowledged by practically everyone in touch with science) that epidemiology analyzes all diseases.

a) researches the occurrence and distribution of any type of health-related event, state, or process in specific populations, including the study of the ‘determinants’ (biological, clinical, sanitary, sociocultural, and political) that influence such processes; and b) researches the occurrence and distribution of any type of health-related event, state, or process in specific populations, including the study of the ‘determinants’ (biological, clinical, sanitary, sociocultural, and political) that

b) it uses this information to address significant human health issues.

Many of us believe that today’s rigid ‘insular’ views of disciplines make little sense, either scientifically or socially; on the other hand, epidemiology and many other health, life, and social sciences connect and collaborate in amazing ways. Because of the porousness and fluidity of the disciplines, vast areas of the present scientific world are open and interconnected – considerably more creative, relevant, efficient, and intriguing.

Today, both ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ epidemiology, research methodologies with strong epidemiological foundations, dimensions, and qualities are successfully utilized. In the later decades of the twentieth century, there was a positive blurring of the boundaries of epidemiological research methods, such as the incorporation of population thinking and group comparison into clinical and public health research. It is particularly notable because this effect has spread to other scientific domains (e.g., ‘-omics’ disciplines). This growth of impact differs from what occurred as a result of clinical epidemiology and, later, evidence-based medicine (and today evidence-based health care). In clinical medicine, the hypotheses at stake are frequently quite different from those in, say, molecular biology or proteomics. Today, epidemiological thinking and reasoning continues to create new approaches, research designs, strategies of analysis, and ways to assess causality for such (micro)biological, clinical, and (macro)social disciplines, largely because of this ontological fact, because biotechnologies generate and drive different types and amounts of information and research, and for other reasons.

Which historical figure from your field would you most like to invite to a dinner party? What would you ask him/her if you had the chance?

She isn’t yet a part of history, but some of us believe she will be – or that she already is. She’s that young student or professional you know who excels at combining science and human impact, theoretical knowledge and practice, biological mechanisms and the clinical, social, and environmental dimensions of health, methodological rigor and creativity and relevance, moral courage, elegance, compassion, and political boldness… She also has a lot of fun on top of it all. ‘How come you have so much fun?’ I’d ask her, smiling.