Healing/Autonomy Case Study Analysis
Healing And Autonomy Case Study
For Healing/Autonomy Case Study Analysis Assignment, Write a 1,500 word analysis of “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy.” In light of the readings, be sure to address the following questions:
- Under the Christian narrative and Christian vision, what sorts of issues are most pressing in this case study?
- Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James?
- According to the Christian narrative and the discussion of the issues of treatment refusal, patient autonomy, and organ donation in the topic readings, how might one analyze this case?
- According to the topic readings and lecture, how ought the Christian think about sickness and health? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James?
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
NO PLAGIARISM PLEASE, MINIMUM OF 3 REFERENCES
Case Study of Healing and Autonomy
Introduction
The case study at hand evaluates the decisions made by Mike and Joanne in the perspective of medical intervention to their son James. Mike’s decisions in delaying James’s treatment are analyzed in Christian faith’s context. Furthermore, the future actions taken by the couples are examined in terms of Christian faith and beliefs (Hamlin, 2009). Besides, issues related to rationality are also emphasized, Christian vision concerning the autonomy of the patient, kidney transplant, right of denying treatment among others (Ferngen, 2009).
Under the Christian narrative and Christian vision, what sorts of issues are most pressing in this case study?
The most pressing issue which James and Joanne are facing is believing in the spiritual healing and health from God. According to Christian view of healing, the ultimate healing comes from the will of God. Christians have several beliefs in their journey of faith such as prayer, fasting, anointing of oil and healing. They belief that God blesses the process of anointing of oils which assists in the healing process when placed on the believers. As seen in the case study, Mike and Joanne decides to prolong James’s dialysis by placing their faith in the healing power of God. Witnessing one of their friends receive Christian healing from stroke is one of the reasons why the couples decides to put their trust in healing from God. The healing gave James and Joanne hope that their son will soon get well by throwing their faith and trust in God. However, the healing service attended by the parents did not act immediately to heal their son and instead James’s condition become worse than before.
Healing/Autonomy Case Study Analysis
Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him be irrational and harmful to James?
The Physician needs to advice James that the decisions He is making are irrational and harmful to the son. The physician is much aware of the James complications and knows that the child will require a kidney transplant within a period of one year or less. Failure to do that the nephrologists knows the consequences that may befall on James. Therefore, given the expertise and wealth of experience in the field, the nephrologist needs to take further actions in saving the life of James. Although God is the one who heals, what the couples failed to understand is the phrase that “God helps one who has helped himself.” The phrase implies that God heals one who has sought medical intervention. As a result, the physician needs to inform the couples that they need to seek medical assistance of their child and then place the rest of the trust on God for healing.
According to Hastie & Dawes (2010), there are number of factors which limits a person’s ability to make rational decisions. First, instead of performing analysis of all available alternatives, human beings tend to evaluate a limited number of options at a time and this is seen by James and Joanne when they decide to try God’s healing first. Second, instead of doing simultaneous analysis of options, people will opt sequential analysis which is dangerous. In the process of performing sequential analysis, human beings will select the option which they perceive is going to provide a satisfactory outcome. According to James’s parents, it is spiritual healing which brings a satisfactory result to them that is why they first foregoes medical dialysis to spiritual intervention. Third, choice evaluation is significantly influenced by previous experiences. In this case, the spiritual healing of the patient suffering from stroke influences the parents to forego clinical treatment for spiritual healing. Fourth, the patients and their relatives often perceive the information evaluating clinical practices and results as imprecise and uncertain. For this reason, the parents of the kid do not want to rely on clinical treatment as their first option.
The patients and their relatives often experience challenges because most of the times their choices are not based on the scientific concepts of rationality. However, for the case of physicians is a different case because they are educated people and make their choices on scientific facts. The physician is able to utilize the rational-choice model in analysis making decisions. As a consequence, the physician in this case study should apply the rationale-choice model in analyzing the harmful effects associated with Mike’s decision and advise him to change for the better…