Federal Drug Administration Smoke Cessation Program
Federal Drug Administration Smoke Cessation Program essay assignment
Federal Drug Administration Smoke Cessation Program essay assignment
The purpose of this project is to exercise what described in many programs’ evaluation framework and handbooks as a theory based approach to develop or write a program evaluation plan. The validity and hence the quality of your plan is defined by the theories/models you follow and the way they are used, as well as by the literatures that would greatly support your work. In addition to these principles, writing, organization of your paper, the rigor of research methods, and the analysis plan, etc. are
all part of the game. Overall, this is a work that synthesize the knowledge and skills you have gained in the past.
What to include Suggestion or Rationale
A title page:
Contains an easily identifiable program name, dates, and type of Evaluation.
It is better to cover target population, key program action, expected outcome or type of evaluation.
Get solution to your nursing paper : Federal Drug Administration Smoke Cessation Program
Introduction
One to two paragraphs to describe why you choose this program and the literature review that support the design of your evaluation plan
This can be brief and focus on the principles. You can write this backwards, meaning you have developed something and then come back to write this.
Intended use and users:
Fosters transparency about the purpose(s) of the evaluation and the field significance Purpose can be stated briefly here. Field significance is practically substantial benefits both evaluators and program stakeholders will receive.
Program description
This one of the components in CDC’s program evaluation model. Used here is a demonstration of your understanding about the program, and what information about the program is the most important to the development
of your evaluation plan. This part is especially important to a process
evaluation. In this class, we want to use these terms so we can
all be on the same page in name calling: organization/agent>programs>projects, depending on the actual case. So, if you are eyeing on a project within a program that carried out by an organization, you want to describe the organization, the program,
and the specific project, and their relationships and rationales in order to understand the structure and process. We may skip the stakeholders that beyond the organization. This section often includes a logic model or part of it. Any conceptual model drawn as a diagram, flowchart, and/or table will be welcomed and required.
Program Evaluation Goals and major evaluation questions
Write down evaluation goal statement(s), which should be fairly holistic and ideal but realistic and need-based after inspecting the whole program and
explore possible areas of evaluation (after you have “talked” to skater holders and conducted “description” of the program. Write down overall evaluation questions relevant to the goals. These may reflect major areas of
evaluation needed regardless process or outcome.
Evaluation focus:
• The chosen focus/foci
• How it is chosen (prioritization process which help establish its validity)
• Readiness and capacity for evaluating it
For this exercise, one focus is required. It should be within your stated goals and (broadly defined) evaluation questions. If the focus is on program
impact via a project of many further analysis/descriptions are needed to explain what it is. Why is it? Etc.
7. Methods: Identifies evaluation indicators and performance measures, data sources and methods, as well as roles and responsibilities.
• Literature review, and fitting
evaluation models/frameworks
• Indicators of evaluation
• Measurement (scales) of the indicates
• Data collection process
• Data analysis plan
• Expected findings
• Possible validity issues
Here goes to the detail about how to evaluate the impact, including its inclusion (factors, indicators), measurement, design of inquiry method, etc. This is when most published peer review articles can provide reference, insights, and defense. This is also when a model can be used at a more detailed format.
Your data collection may need more than one modality, a survey for some indicators and an observational study for others, just for example.
It is a great exercise to look for journal articles/professional publications that can be used as a direct reference. In this class, following some
examples from such sources can be viewed as a way to establish the validity of your plan.
As a convention, your final paper should be double spaced, 12font size, one inch margin, and justified on left in format.
It depends on the (community) program you will study about, the evaluation focus you will define, and evaluation plan you will
develop to determine where you give more narratives in your paper. So, it is not so critical you should put equal weights on the
items listed in above table. However, methods and validity are two things this class emphasizes. So, you want to have a solid
discussion in your paper.
Using theories and literature support in developing your plan and writing your paper is required.