DNP 801 Topic 3 Assignment Identify a valid patient practice problem

DNP 801 Topic 3 Assignment Identify a valid patient practice problem

DNP 801 Topic 3 Assignment Identify a valid patient practice problem

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The identification of a relevant nursing practice problem at your practice site is the first step towards starting your DPI Project. Upon identification of a patient practice problem, the next step is to evaluate the practice problem to ensure it can be supported through an intervention, and if so, that the intervention is acceptable for your practice site.

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a valid patient practice problem at your practice site that can be realistically addressed through a DPI Project.

General Requirements:

• Use the attached “Selecting a Practice Problem” worksheet to complete this assignment.
• Use the “PICOT-D Selection Guidelines,” located in the DC Network, to assist in completing this assignment.
• Use the “Levels of Evidence in Research,” located in the Class Resources, to assist in completing the assignment.
• Use the “Searching Nursing Databases,” located on the Doctor of Nursing Practice page in the GCU Library, to assist in completing the assignment.
• A minimum of two primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of your anticipated graduation date, are required to complete this assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

Complete the steps on the “Selecting a Practice Problem” worksheet to identify a valid patient practice problem that you want to propose for your DPI Project. The proposed practice problem must meet the criteria for a PICOT-D and be supported by current primary quantitative literature.

If your instructor indicates that you have selected an appropriate topic, you will use your selected practice problem for all subsequent assignments in this course. Be sure to incorporate all feedback prior to beginning the next assignment. If you are directed to select a different practice problem, work with your instructor to select an appropriate topic prior to beginning the next assignment.

DNP-801A-RS3-Selecting Practice Problem

Selecting a Practice Problem – Rubric

Licensure Information and Scope of Practice

5 points

Criteria Description

Licensure Information and Scope of Practice

5. Target

5 points

Licensure information is complete. The proposed practice problem and intervention are within the specified scope of nursing practice.

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : DNP 801 Topic 3 Assignment Identify a valid patient practice problem

Get assistance with nursing paper

4. Acceptable

4.6 points

NA

3. Approaching

4.4 points

NA

2. Insufficient

4 points

Licensure information is presented, but the proposed practice problem or intervention is not within the specified scope of nursing practice.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Licensure information is omitted.

Type and Focus of Proposed Practice Site

15 points

Criteria Description

Type and Focus of Proposed Practice Site

5. Target

15 points

The type and focus of the proposed practice site are clearly and accurately described.

4. Acceptable

13.8 points

NA

3. Approaching

13.2 points

NA

2. Insufficient

12 points

The type and focus of the proposed practice site are unclear. More specific information is needed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The type and focus of the proposed practice site are omitted.

Patient Practice Problem Occurring at Site

15 points

Criteria Description

Patient Practice Problem Occurring at Site

5. Target

15 points

A patient practice problem occurring at the proposed practice, including why it is considered a patient problem, is clearly explained. Supporting data, or a plan for obtaining the data needed, are provided.

4. Acceptable

13.8 points

A patient practice problem occurring at the proposed practice, including why it is considered a patient problem, is adequately explained. Supporting data, or a plan for obtaining the data needed, are provided. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Approaching

13.2 points

A patient practice problem occurring at the proposed practice, including why it is considered a patient problem, is generally explained. Supporting data, or a general plan for obtaining the data needed, are provided. Additional detail or information is needed.

2. Insufficient

12 points

The explanation of the patient practice problem is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The patient practice problem is omitted.

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

15 points

Criteria Description

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

5. Target

15 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention for addressing the patient practice problem at the site, including how it is different from what is currently in place, is clearly described. Why the intervention is realistic and feasible for the practice site is clearly explained.

4. Acceptable

13.8 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention for addressing the patient practice problem at the site, including how it is different from what is currently in place, is adequately described. Why the intervention is realistic and feasible for the practice site is explained. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Approaching

13.2 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention for addressing the patient practice problem at the site, including how it is different from what is currently in place, is outlined. It is unclear why the intervention is realistic and feasible for the practice site. Additional detail or information is needed.

2. Insufficient

12 points

The explanation for the proposed evidence-based intervention for addressing the patient practice problem at the site is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention for addressing the patient practice problem at the site is omitted.

Team Implementing the DPI Intervention

10 points

Criteria Description

Team Implementing the DPI Intervention

5. Target

10 points

The team that will be implementing the DPI intervention is clearly described. The team is designed so the learner has no interaction with the patients.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

The team that will be implementing the DPI intervention is adequately described. The team is designed so the learner has no interaction with the patients. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

The team that will be implementing the DPI intervention is outlined. The team appears to be designed so the learner has no interaction with the patients. Additional detail or information is needed.

2. Insufficient

8 points

The team that will be implementing the DPI intervention is only partially discussed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The team that will be implementing the DPI intervention is not discussed. The learner is identified as a member of the team interacting with the patients.

Measurable Patient Outcomes

10 points

Criteria Description

Measurable Patient Outcomes

5. Target

10 points

The expected measurable patient outcome based on implementing the intervention, including how the new proposed process or intervention will improve the outcome, is thoroughly discussed. Details for obtaining the descriptive demographic data on the patient sample population and the measurable patient outcome data are included.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

The expected measurable patient outcome based on implementing the intervention, including how the new proposed process or intervention will improve the outcome, is adequately discussed. Suggestions for obtaining the descriptive demographic data on the patient sample population and the measurable patient outcome data are included. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

The expected measurable patient outcome based on implementing the intervention, including how the new proposed process or intervention will improve the outcome, is adequately discussed. Suggestions for obtaining the descriptive demographic data on the patient sample population, and the measurable patient outcome data are included.

2. Insufficient

8 points

A discussion of the expected measurable patient outcome based on implementing the intervention and how the new proposed process or intervention will improve the outcome is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of the expected measurable patient outcome based on implementing the intervention is omitted.

8-Week Timeframe

10 points

Criteria Description

8-Week Timeframe

5. Target

10 points

An explanation for how the DPI Project can be implemented within the 8-week timeframe is clearly described.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

An explanation for how the DPI Project can be implemented within the 8-week timeframe is adequately described. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

An outline for how the DPI Project can be implemented within the 8-week timeframe is presented. Additional detail or information is needed.

2. Insufficient

8 points

An incomplete outline for how the DPI Project can be implemented within the 8-week timeframe is presented.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

How the DPI Project can be implemented within the 8-week timeframe is not explained.

Primary Quantitative Research

10 points

Criteria Description

APA format and includes working links; Meets criteria on levels of evidence for primary research; published within 5 years of anticipated graduation date; working links are provided for each article.

5. Target

10 points

Two primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, are presented accurately in APA format. Each article meets the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Each article demonstrates strong support for the proposed intervention.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

Two primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, are presented using general APA format. There are one or two errors. Each article meets the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Each article demonstrates adequate support for the proposed intervention.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

One primary quantitative research article, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, meets the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. The article is in APA format, but has several errors. The article provides general support for the proposed intervention.

2. Insufficient

8 points

The research articles presented do not fully meet the required criteria. It is unclear how the articles support the proposed intervention. APA format is not used; the articles cannot be accessed or found.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Research articles have not been provided.

Mechanics of Writing

10 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

5. Target

10 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable

9.2 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Approaching

8.8 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Insufficient

8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Total 100 points