Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluations
Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluations
Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluations
In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?
Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?
Order an original top nursing paper. Get writing help with your paper: Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluations
In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.
To Prepare: Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluations Essay Paper
- In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making.
- Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.
By Day 3 of Week 9
Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 9
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 9 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 9 Discussion
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.).
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only)
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of
health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.
American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.
Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R.
(2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program
to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991.
Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing
Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003
Document: Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Template (Word document)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Importance of Program Evaluation [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Peter Beilenson: Ethics and advocacy [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
The Role of Nurses in Policy Evaluation
The process of health policy development ends at the evaluation stage, which involves identifying the effectiveness and relevance of the policies. As Indicated in Stewart, et al., (2020), the ICN (International Council of Nurses) has actively championed the involvement of nurses in the policy development process, right from the beginning to the end. The participation of nurses in health policies helps to safeguard care quality through access to opportunities and required resources. This paper presents the opportunities that presently exist for APRNs/RNs to take part in the policy review actively.
Nurses have excellent communication skills that are useful in policy evaluation; thus increasing the influence nurses have on healthcare policies. Nurses are the closest to patients and gain most of their communication skills from the constant communication they have with their patients and their families (Patton, Zalon, &Ludwick, 2018). Besides, have they advanced skills in advocacy, a quality that puts them in the best position to take part in the process of policy review. Because APRNs/RNs have been known to advocate for their patients, their involvement in policy review will go a long way in removing the old policies that may have failed to conform to new regulations and rules and address new technologies. In amending the existing systems, the opinion of nurses should be taken as the current needs of patients.
These opportunities may, however, present some challenges in evaluating healthcare policies. The nurse may take advantage of their communication skills to review a healthcare policy in favor of their requests or opinions (Potter, et al., 2016). They can also use their advocacy skills to evaluate policies based on their interest or views. Therefore, I would recommend some set of standards that govern how nurses utilize their communication skills to impact healthcare policies. Besides the opinions of nurses when reviewing healthcare policies should first pass through a set committee to evaluate if they are the actual needs of the patients.
References
Patton, R. M., Zalon, M. L., &Ludwick, R. (Eds.). (2018). Nurses making policy: From bedside to boardroom. Springer Publishing Company.
Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P., & Hall, A. (2016). Fundamentals of Nursing-E-Book. Elsevier health sciences.
Stewart, D., Kennedy, A., Schober, M., & Duignan, M. (2020). International Council of Nurses. In Advanced Practice Nursing Leadership: A Global Perspective (pp. 15-23). Springer, Cham.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-20550-8_2