Current Topics in Nursing Informatics
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with Current Topics in Nursing Informatics assignment
Current Topics in Nursing Informatics
Each student in this course possesses a unique background and skill set. Drawing from your own career and experiences, identify a current information-technology-related problem or opportunity for improvement.
- Explain the scope of the problem using both anecdotal and evidentiary information to “build your case”
- Once you have identified and explained the problem, propose a solution or series of steps to be taken in order to improve the situation
- Your recommendations for improvement may include design and utilization of new technology or perhaps upgrades to that which already exists
- Be creative in your approach
- Explain how the changes will benefit nursing and improve patient outcomes
- Topics for discussion may include (but are not limited to): legal ramifications of information technology/systems, ethical considerations in information technology, redundancy in documentation, ease of use and navigation in chosen operating system, or the use of data to improve health outcomes
- Approach this assignment as though you are the advanced-practice informatics nurse responsible for convincing others that a change is needed and then moving forward with planning, implementation, and evaluation of the project
Get Assistance With Nursing Paper
Current Topics in Nursing Informatics Essay assignment
Use language that reflects the proper use of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and word choice. Make sure the paper is well organized, using headings throughout to guide the reader.
Name: Discussion Rubric
| Excellent 90–100 |
Good 80–89 |
Fair 70–79 |
Poor 0–69 |
|||
| Main Posting: Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
||
| Main Posting: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Posts main Discussion by due date. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
||
| First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: Discussion Rubric
24/7 Nursing Homework Help
Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!
