Combine all elements completed in previous weeks (Topics 1-4) into one cohesive evidence-based proposal and share the proposal with a leader in your organization.
Constructing the Written Evidence-Based Proposal: Final assignment
Combine all elements completed in previous weeks (Topics 1-4) into one cohesive evidence-based proposal and share the proposal with a leader in your organization. (Appropriate individuals include unit managers, department directors, clinical supervisors, charge nurses, and clinical educators.)
Obtain feedback from the leader you have selected and request verification using the Capstone Review Form. Submit the signed Capstone Review Form to .edu”>RNBSNclientcare@gcu.edu.
For information on how to complete the assignment, refer to “Writing Guidelines” and the “Exemplar of Evidence-Based Practice Capstone Paper.”
Include a title page, abstract, problem statement, conclusion, reference section, and appendices (if tables, graphs, surveys, diagrams, etc. are created from tools required in Topic 4).
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : Combine all elements completed in previous weeks (Topics 1-4) into one cohesive evidence-based proposal and share the proposal with a leader in your organization.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category |
10 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
|
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
|
- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
- Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
- Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
|
- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
- Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
|
- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
- Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
- Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
|
- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
- The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
|
- No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
- Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
|
| Performance Category |
10 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
|
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
|
- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
- Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
|
- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
- Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
- Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
|
- Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
- Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
|
- Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
- Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
|
- Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
- No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
|
| Performance Category |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread)
|
- Exceeds minimum post requirements
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
- Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
- Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
|
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
- Replies to a question posed by a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
- Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
- The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
- Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
|
- Has only one post for the week
- Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
|
- Does not post to the thread
- No connections are made to the topic
|
|
Minus 1 Point |
Minus 2 Point |
Minus 3 Point |
Minus 4 Point |
Minus 5 Point |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
- 2-3 errors in APA format.
- Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
|
- 4-5 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is somewhat focused.
|
- 6-7 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
|
- 8-10 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
|
- Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
- Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style does not facilitate communication.
- The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
|
|
0 points lost |
|
|
|
-5 points lost |
|
Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread
|
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. |
|
|
|
The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days |
|
Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread
|
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. |
|
|
|
The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
24/7 Nursing Homework Help
Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!
