Assignment: Public Health Program Planning NSG 486

Public Health Program Planning NSG 486 Assignment Help

NSG486 Public Health Promotion And Disease Prevention

Week 3 Assignment Public Health Program Planning

Assignment Content

Review the Healthy People 2020 Leading Health Indicators.

Select one leading health indicator and research a state-level health prevention program aimed at achieving it.

Locate your state’s vital statistics and/or census data to compare the outcomes of the selected leading health indicator.

Evaluate the state-level program’s effectiveness in meeting the Healthy People 2020 goals based on your statistical and census data findings.

Determine if there is evidence in your community of alignment to the Healthy People 2020 goals through local programs and funding.

Assignment: Public Health Program Planning NSG 486Explain the evidence by providing links, a description, and summary of the program(s).

Format your assignment as one of the following:

• 18- to 20-slide presentation
• 3- to 4-minute podcast
• 15- to 20-minute oral presentation
• 875-word paper
• Legal-sized infographic
• Another format approved by your instructor

GET PAPER HELP. PLACE AN ORDER FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER Assignment: Public Health Program Planning NSG 486

Get assistance with nursing paper

What distinguishes program evaluation from ongoing informal assessment is that program evaluation is conducted according to a set of guidelines.

Assignment: Public Health Program Planning NSG 486With that in mind, this manual defines program evaluation as “the systematic collection of information about the activities, characteristics, and outcomes of programs to make judgments about the program, improve program effectiveness, and/or inform decisions about future program development.”
5 Program
evaluation does not occur in a vacuum; rather, it is influenced by real-world constraints.
Assignment: Public Health Program Planning NSG 486Evaluation should be practical and feasible and conducted within the confines of resources, time, and political context. Moreover, it should serve a useful purpose, be conducted in an ethical manner, and produce accurate findings. Evaluation findings should be used both to make decisions about program implementation and to improve program effectiveness.