Assignment: EHR Database and Management

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPERASSIGNMENT:Assignment: EHR Database and Management

DNP 805 Week 4 Assignment EHR Database and Data Management

Details

As a DNP-prepared nurse, you may be called upon to assist in the design of a clinical database for your organization. This assignment requires you to integrate a clinical problem with data technologies to better understand the components as well as how those components can lead to better clinical outcomes.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:

For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you:

Select a clinically-based patient problem in which using a database management approach provides clear benefit potential.
Identify the data needed to manage this patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR).
Include a brief description of the patient problem which incorporates information needed to manage the specific problem.
Identifies whether the EHR-supplied data is structured or unstructured with an explanation as to why.
Provide a complete description of the structured and unstructured data from the EHR that are needed to organize a hypothetical database.
Provide a complete description of data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database.
Portfolio Practice Hours:

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-805

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	4.4 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	4.6 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem	0 points Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is not present.	12 points Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is marginal or incomplete.	13.2 points Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present but at a perfunctory level.	13.8 points Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	15 points Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	0 points Sources are not documented.	4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	4.4 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	4.6 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose	0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	5.6 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	6.16 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	6.44 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	7 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation	0 points Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured with an explanation is not present.	8 points Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with or without an explanation but is marginal or incomplete.	8.8 points Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with an explanation but is rendered at a perfunctory level.	9.2 points Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10 points Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction	0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	6.4 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	7.04 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	7.36 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	8 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	4 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	4.4 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	4.6 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	5 points All format elements are correct.
Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database	0 points Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described.	12 points Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.	13.2 points Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.	13.8 points Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	15 points Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database	0 points Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are not described.	8 points Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.	8.8 points Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.	9.2 points Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10 points Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic He Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic Health Record (EHR)	0 points Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is not present.	8 points Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is marginal or incomplete.	8.8 points Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present but at a perfunctory level.	9.2 points Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10 points Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem	0 points Patient problem selection does not provide clear benefit potential by using a database management approach.	8 points Patient problem selection indicates some benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is marginal or incomplete.	8.8 points Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is perfunctory.	9.2 points Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10 points Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem

0 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is not present.

12 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is marginal or incomplete.

13.2 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present but at a perfunctory level.

13.8 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

15 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation

0 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured with an explanation is not present.

8 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with or without an explanation but is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with an explanation but is rendered at a perfunctory level.

9.2 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

5 points

All format elements are correct.

Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database

0 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described.

12 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.

13.2 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.

13.8 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

15 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database

0 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are not described.

8 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.

9.2 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic He

Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

0 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is not present.

8 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present but at a perfunctory level.

9.2 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem

0 points

Patient problem selection does not provide clear benefit potential by using a database management approach.

8 points

Patient problem selection indicates some benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is perfunctory.

9.2 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

24/7 Nursing Homework Help

Stuck with your nursing assignment? From Essays to Complicated Dissertations? Our accredited nursing paper writers can answer it all!

Assignment: EHR Database and Management

Assignment: EHR Database and Management