Mental Disorders and Data Screening

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : Mental Disorders and Data Screening

Mental Disorders and Data Screening

Mental Disorders and Data Screening
Mental Disorders and Data Screening: (Part 1a)
https://topnursingpapers.com/mental-disorders-and-data-screening/
Using one of the research methods discussed in the text, locate and read a recent, full-text article from the Capella Library that utilizes biological research in the study of a particular disorder or behavior. Choose a disorder or behavior you will most likely work with in your particular  area of specialization. The study should utilize one or more of the research techniques of behavioral genetics (such as twin studies, adoption studies, targeted mutations, or psychophysiological techniques not related to genetics).  Summarize the article, and outline the problem and the hypotheses of the study. Which research techniques were used?
Analyze and explain how these techniques were helpful in answering the research questions.
Cite and reference your article using APA formatting.
Mental Disorders and Data Screening
(Part 1b)  Data Screening
What are the goals of data screening? How can you identify and remedy the following?
Errors in data entry.

Trust our nursing essay writing for guaranteed top grades. Don’t take chances with online services that write nursing papers and other assignments. We are specialists since we solely compose top-notch nursing papers online.

Outliers.
Missing data.

Nursing essay writing service aimed at your success. Achieve academic excellence with our custom writing service.

  • Count on the best nursing essay papers writing service online. Order custom papers; No plagiarism. Your success, our success.

Mental Disorders and Data Screening

(Readings Part 1a) Readings
In your Physiology of Behavior text, read Chapter 5, “Methods and Strategies of Research,” pages 130–163.
Optional Internet Resources
If you choose, you may explore Montreal Neurological Institute: Brain Imaging Demos.

(Part 1b)  Studies
Readings
Use your George and Mallery text to complete the following:

Review the “An Introduction to the Example” section of Chapter 1. This section provides definitions of SPSS variables used in your Unit 3 assignments.
Read Chapter 6 “Frequencies.” This reading addresses the following topics:
Frequencies.
Bar Charts.
Histograms.
Percentiles.
Read Chapter 7 “Descriptive Statistics.” This reading addresses the following topics:
Statistical Significance.
The Normal Distribution.
Mean, Median, and Mode.
Variance and Standard Deviation Skewness, and Kurtosis.
Maximum, Minimum, Range, and Sum.
Standard Error.
Your SPSS Data Set
The grades.sav file is a sample SPSS data set from the George and Mallery text. The fictional data represent a teacher’s recording of student demographics and performance on quizzes and a final exam across three sections of the course. Each section consists of about 35 students ( N = 105).

Last week, you converted grades2.dat to grades.sav. There are 21 variables in grades.sav.

Open your grades.sav file and navigate to the “Variable View” tab.
Click the link to open the Data Set Instructions and make sure you have the correct Values and Scales of Measurement assigned.
Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent
90–100
Good
80–89
Fair
70–79
Poor
0–69
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three current credible sources.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).
Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible references.
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Cited with fewer than two credible references.
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible references.
Main Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main Discussion by due date.
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
First Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

24/7 Nursing Homework Help

Stuck on a nursing assignment question? From easy essays to complicated dissertations, our accredited writers can answer all questions!

Order a nursing paper essay