Preparation

THIS ASSESSMENT IS IN TWO PARTS:

Part 1: Project Report.

This report should be succinct, substantive, and written for a hypothetical executive leadership team. It is not a lengthy academic paper.

• Part 2: Project Report Presentation.

This presentation is an overview of the project, also intended for an executive leadership team.

Presentation Tools

• You may use Kaltura Media or other technology of your choice for your audio recording.
• If using Kaltura Media, refer to the Using Kaltura tutorial for directions on recording and uploading your video in the courseroom.

Requirements

• Part 1: Project Report

Develop your data review project report. Use the Data Review Project Report Template, linked in the Resources of this unit. This template is different from the Data Review Project Proposal Template used in Assessment 2. Authoritative sources should be integrated into the Evidence-Based Recommendations and Conclusion sections of the report.

Provide a minimum of three visual data summaries (for example, pie chart, graph, spreadsheet, and process map), two evidence-based recommendations from the literature, and one new insight. Place these additions in your document under the headings: Data Display, Recommendations, and Conclusion.

Trust our nursing essay writing for guaranteed top grades. Don’t take chances with online services that write nursing papers and other assignments. We are specialists since we solely compose top-notch nursing papers online.

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : Capella University Data Review Report Paper

Add, in an appendix, the balanced scorecard table that you have created in Assessment 2.

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the first five grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your project report addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Report and Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

• Align a problem statement, performance indicators, and outcome measures with an organizational strategic need.

What additional information would strengthen the alignment and make it more explicit?

Summarize the key findings from a review of current and relevant authoritative literature.

BE CONCISE AND SUBSTANTIVE. PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION IN THE SUMMARY TO ADEQUATELY COVER THE SELECTED TOPIC.

Consider adding additional best practice sources to your initial review of the current literature.

Articulate the value of a project to an organization.

Consider a strategic systems perspective when contemplating value to the organization.

Express main points, assertions, and conclusions clearly and effectively.

Be sure you have evidence to support your conclusions.

Analyze performance data and trends.

Your nursing paper is in safe hands. Trust the experts for the best nursing papers.

Present your visual data displays, along with a concise analysis.

• Describe the significant findings, trends, and any new insights evident from the data summaries.

Determine if there are any limitations to your findings, obstacles to collection or interpretation of data, or potential for bias.

• Ensure your data is valid and reliable.
• Provide evidence-based recommendations, a conclusion for problem resolution, and organizational transformation.

Identify a short list of interventions to solve the problem, supported by current (published within the past 3–5 years) authoritative literature.

• Consider how legal, regulatory, ethical, patient safety, and organizational factors are related to the problem.
• Make realistic recommendations that are within the organization’s capability. They should not be based upon uncertain funding sources such as government grants, which might be discontinued.
• Make your recommendations sufficiently compelling to convince the target audience to implement them.

Include, more importantly, a clear statement about how the project added value to the organization and aligned with the organization’s strategic direction and goals.

• Combine clear, coherent, and original writing, in APA style, with relevant and credible evidence from the scholarly and professional literature.
• Apply correct APA formatting to your source citations.
• Consider how or why a particular piece of evidence supports your main points, claims, or conclusions.
• Make sure your supporting evidence is clear and explicit.

PART 2: PROJECT REPORT PRESENTATION

• Provide a concise overview of your project in a recorded slide presentation. Use the Data Review Project Report Presentation Template, linked in the Resources of this unit.
• Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the sixth grading criterion in the scoring guide. Be sure your presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Data Review Project Report and Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how the following criterion will be assessed.
• Present a concise, substantive project overview to decision makers.
• Be clear and focused on your presentation.
• Address the anticipated needs and concerns of your audience.

Apply best practices to the design and development of your presentation materials.

• Support your main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.
• Be sure to format citations and references using APA style.

Top nursing paper writers on hand to assist you with assignment : Capella University Data Review Report Paper

Project Report on Data Review Capella University MHA5020 Project Title Learner Name Date Instructor Name Project Title • Formulation of the Problem • Factors investigated and units of measurement • Literature Review Important Findings • Data Presentation • Data analysis. • Recommendations Based on Evidence • The conclusion. • Bibliography. Units of measurement and a statement of the problem factors examined Literature Review: Important Findings (1) Data Presentation (1) Data Presentation (2) Data Analysis Evidence Based Recommendations Conclusion Bibliography Data Analysis Project Report Template The following elements should be included in your Data Review Project Report: Include the project topic, course title, your name, the date, the instructor’s name, the client organization, and the contact person to whom the report is being submitted on the cover page. Include all headings and subheadings, a list of figures and tables, a list of appendices, and right-justified page numbers in the table of contents. Executive Summary: 1-2 double-spaced pages with the title [Final project title] Executive Summary Include an explicit, succinct purpose, project focus, project rationale, data examination method (data review), metrics for performance measurement, and a specific outcomes data summary statement. It is critical that your executive summary demonstrates how the project benefited the organization. The abstract should be no more than 500 words long. Paragraph 1: Introduction Clearly communicate the project’s purpose and focus, the order in which topics will be introduced, and a transition sentence to the body of the document. [Identify the condition that] contributes to [identify the negative outcome] (source, year). Examine the literature: Identify the authoritative sources that were used to justify the purpose and focus of your data review, summarized in short statements and accompanied by citations. Body of the data analysis: Use headings and sub-headings, and make sure the table of contents reflects this. Adapt the following examples of suggested content areas to your project: • Focus. • Situational assessment: Describe the project’s context. What organizational considerations and context exist? • Justification for participating in the project. • A description of the data collected for the project. o The method or framework that was used. o Data measurement units These must be stated explicitly, precisely, and easily accessible. o At least three visual data summaries in charts, graphs, tables, or any other format, along with a discussion. • Data analysis and reasoning for your interpretation Are there any limitations to your findings, challenges to data collection or interpretation, or the possibility of bias? • Examine the accuracy and dependability of your data. Suggestions for the future: Give at least two evidence-based recommendations that are supported by recent (within the last 3-5 years) authoritative literature. Your recommendations should be realistic, within the capabilities of the organization, and not based on uncertain funding sources, such as government grants that may be terminated. 1 final thought: Provide your findings and results, recommendations, and leadership insights. Most importantly, your conclusion should include a clear statement about how the project added value to the organization and was aligned with it. List of references: List sources that are relevant, credible, and peer-reviewed in proper APA format. All web resource links must be active (working). This report does not accept Wikipedia or secondary source literature. Appendices: Each appendix should begin with a letter and end with a title, such as “Appendix A: Situational Analysis Using Porter’s Model.” Note: Include the balanced scorecard table you created in Assessment 2 as an appendix.